
NVS 510

Radeon RX Vega 3
NVS 510 vs Radeon RX Vega 3 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
NVS 510 vs Radeon RX Vega 3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
NVS 510 vs Radeon RX Vega 3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
NVS 510
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon RX Vega 3 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so NVS 510 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌353.3% higher power demand at 68W vs 15W.
Radeon RX Vega 3
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 68W, a 53W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
NVS 510 vs Radeon RX Vega 3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVS 510
The NVS 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 680 points.

Radeon RX Vega 3
The Radeon RX Vega 3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1001 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 684 points.
Graphics Performance
The NVS 510 scores 680 and the Radeon RX Vega 3 reaches 684 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The NVS 510 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon RX Vega 3 uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (NVS 510) vs 192 (Radeon RX Vega 3). Raw compute: 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 510) vs 0.3844 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 3). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1001 MHz.
| Feature | NVS 510 | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 680 | 684 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 ×2+167% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.058 TFLOPS ×2+175% | 0.3844 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1033 MHz+3% | 1001 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 ×2+300% | 4 |
| TMUs | 32 ×2+167% | 12 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | NVS 510 | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The NVS 510 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 3 carries 0 MB. NVS 510 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the NVS 510 and System on the Radeon RX Vega 3.
| Feature | NVS 510 | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (NVS 510) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 3). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | NVS 510 | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (NVS 510) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX Vega 3). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (NVS 510) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 3).
| Feature | NVS 510 | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 1st Gen NVENC | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The NVS 510 draws 68W versus the Radeon RX Vega 3's 15W — a 127.7% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 3 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 510) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 3). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 160mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 75.
| Feature | NVS 510 | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 68W | 15W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 160mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-13% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 10.0 | 45.6+356% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the NVS 510 came in at $449, while the Radeon RX Vega 3 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon RX Vega 3 was 100+% cheaper ($449 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (NVS 510) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 3) — the Radeon RX Vega 3 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega 3 (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | NVS 510 | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.5 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM107 | Picasso |
| Release | November 4 2015 | January 6 2019 |
| Ranking | #826 | #845 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















