NVS 510
VS
Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual

NVS 510 vs Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual

NVS 510

2015Core: 902 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual

2013Core: 720 / 775 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The NVS 510 is positioned at rank 321 and the Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual is on rank 493, so the NVS 510 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar NVS 510

#306
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
9783%
#321
NVS 510
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
100%
#322
GRID M60-1Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50
98%
#323
GRID K280Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50
94%
#324
FirePro M2000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
94%
#325
Tesla K20c
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500
92%
#326
GRID M6-1Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
91%
#327
Quadro FX 380
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
91%
#328
Tesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30
91%
#329
FirePro M7740
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
88%
#330
Quadro FX 570
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
86%
#331
RTXA5000-24Q
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100
85%
#332
GRID P40-1Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
85%
#334
Tesla C2050
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95
84%
#335
Tesla M10
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
84%
#336
FirePro S10000
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual

#483
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2305%
#485
2090%
#486
2084%
#490
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1895%
#491
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1882%
#493
100%
#494
100%
#495
96%
#496
Radeon HD 8180
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
96%
#498
Radeon R8 M535DX
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#500
Radeon R5 230
MSRP: $50|Avg: $25
94%
#501
GeForce 9300 GE
MSRP: $23|Avg: $25
94%
#502
Mobility Radeon HD 5450
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
93%
#503
Radeon HD 8650G + 8570M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
93%
#504
GeForce 800A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
92%
#505
Mobility Radeon HD 4850
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
92%
#506
92%
#507
92%
#508
Radeon R7 M460
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the NVS 510 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightNVS 510Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-4%)
Leading raw performance (+4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The NVS 510 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the NVS 510 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $150), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 861.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightNVS 510Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+861.8%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of NVS 510 and Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual

NVIDIA

NVS 510

The NVS 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 680 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual

The Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 707 points.

Graphics Performance

The NVS 510 scores 680 and the Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual reaches 707 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 512 (NVS 510) vs 768 (Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual).

FeatureNVS 510Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual
G3D Mark Score
680
707+4%
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512 ×2
768+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureNVS 510Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The NVS 510 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual has 512 MB. The NVS 510 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureNVS 510Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (NVS 510) vs 11_1 (Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureNVS 510Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual
DirectX
12 (11_0)+9%
11_1
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (NVS 510) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) vs UVD 3.

FeatureNVS 510Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual
Encoder
1st Gen NVENC
UVD 3
Decoder
1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)
UVD 3
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The NVS 510 draws 68W versus the Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual's 50W — a 30.5% difference. The Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 510) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureNVS 510Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual
TDP
68W
50W-26%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
160mm
1mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
10.0
14.1+41%
💰

Value Analysis

The NVS 510 launched at $449 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual launched at $150 and now averages $150. The NVS 510 costs 90% less ($135 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 45.3 (NVS 510) vs 4.7 (Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual) — the NVS 510 offers 863.8% better value. The NVS 510 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureNVS 510Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual
MSRP
$449
$150-67%
Avg Price (30d)
$15-90%
$150
Performance per Dollar
45.3+864%
4.7
Codename
GM107
Release
November 4 2015
August 1 2013
Ranking
#826
#881