NVS 510 vs Radeon R5 A6-7480

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

NVS 510 vs Radeon R5 A6-7480 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

NVS 510 vs Radeon R5 A6-7480: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

NVS 510

2015

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 68W instead of 150W, a 82W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1182.9% HIGHER MSRP
$449 MSRPvs$35 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 19.9 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).

Radeon R5 A6-7480

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $414 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1214.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 19.9 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌120.6% higher power demand at 150W vs 68W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R5 A6-7480 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (697 vs 680), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

NVS 510 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 A6-7480 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $414 cheaper on MSRP at $35 vs $449, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1214.9% (19.9 vs 1.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 A6-7480 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, NVS 510 has the stronger long-term case.

NVS 510 vs Radeon R5 A6-7480 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVS 510

The NVS 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 680 points.

Radeon R5 A6-7480

The Radeon R5 A6-7480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 697 points. Launch price was $229.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The NVS 510 scores 680 and the Radeon R5 A6-7480 reaches 697 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The NVS 510 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R5 A6-7480 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (NVS 510) vs 2,304 (Radeon R5 A6-7480). Raw compute: 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 510) vs 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 A6-7480). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1266 MHz.

Feature	NVS 510	Radeon R5 A6-7480
G3D Mark Score	680	697+3%
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	512 ×2	2304+350%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.058 TFLOPS ×2	5.834 TFLOPS+451%
Boost Clock	1033 MHz	1266 MHz+23%
ROPs	16 ×2	32+100%
TMUs	32 ×2	144+350%
L1 Cache	256 KB	576 KB+125%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	NVS 510	Radeon R5 A6-7480
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The NVS 510 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 A6-7480 carries 512 MB. NVS 510 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the NVS 510 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 A6-7480. L2 Cache: 1 MB (NVS 510) vs 2 MB (Radeon R5 A6-7480) — the Radeon R5 A6-7480 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	NVS 510	Radeon R5 A6-7480
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The NVS 510 draws 68W versus the Radeon R5 A6-7480's 150W — a 75.2% difference. The NVS 510 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 510) vs 350W (Radeon R5 A6-7480). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	NVS 510	Radeon R5 A6-7480
TDP	68W-55%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	160mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	10.0+117%	4.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the NVS 510 came in at $449, while the Radeon R5 A6-7480 launched at $35. On MSRP, Radeon R5 A6-7480 was 92.2% cheaper ($414 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (NVS 510) vs 19.9 (Radeon R5 A6-7480) — the Radeon R5 A6-7480 offers 1226.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 A6-7480 (2016 vs 2015).

Feature	NVS 510	Radeon R5 A6-7480
MSRP	$449	$35-92%
Performance per Dollar	1.5	19.9+1227%
Codename	GM107	Ellesmere
Release	November 4 2015	June 29 2016
Ranking	#826	#305

Search NVS 510 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 A6-7480 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.