NVS 510
VS
Radeon HD 6550A

NVS 510 vs Radeon HD 6550A

NVS 510

2015Core: 902 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6550A

2011Core: 600 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The NVS 510 is positioned at rank 321 and the Radeon HD 6550A is on rank 221, so the Radeon HD 6550A offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar NVS 510

#306
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
9783%
#321
NVS 510
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
100%
#322
GRID M60-1Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50
98%
#323
GRID K280Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50
94%
#324
FirePro M2000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
94%
#325
Tesla K20c
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500
92%
#326
GRID M6-1Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
91%
#327
Quadro FX 380
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
91%
#328
Tesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30
91%
#329
FirePro M7740
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
88%
#330
Quadro FX 570
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
86%
#331
RTXA5000-24Q
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100
85%
#332
GRID P40-1Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
85%
#334
Tesla C2050
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95
84%
#335
Tesla M10
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
84%
#336
FirePro S10000
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6550A

#52
Radeon 8060S
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
95%
#53
Radeon RX 6850M XT
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
92%
#211
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
460%
#213
417%
#214
416%
#218
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
378%
#219
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
376%
#221
Radeon HD 6550A
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
100%
#222
99%
#224
GeForce GT 640M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
96%
#228
GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
MSRP: $149|Avg: $40
94%
#230
Maxwell GPU Surface Book
MSRP: $150|Avg: $75
94%
#235
Radeon RX 540
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
91%
#236
Radeon HD 6750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 6550A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the NVS 510 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightNVS 510Radeon HD 6550A
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-4.1%)
Leading raw performance (+4.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The NVS 510 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the NVS 510 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $30), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 92.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightNVS 510Radeon HD 6550A
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+92.1%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of NVS 510 and Radeon HD 6550A

NVIDIA

NVS 510

The NVS 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 680 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6550A

The Radeon HD 6550A is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 708 points.

Graphics Performance

The NVS 510 scores 680 and the Radeon HD 6550A reaches 708 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The NVS 510 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6550A uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (NVS 510) vs 480 (Radeon HD 6550A). Raw compute: 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 510) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6550A).

FeatureNVS 510Radeon HD 6550A
G3D Mark Score
680
708+4%
Architecture
Maxwell
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
512 ×2+7%
480
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.058 TFLOPS ×2+84%
0.576 TFLOPS
ROPs
16 ×2+100%
8
TMUs
32 ×2+33%
24
L1 Cache
256 KB+433%
48 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureNVS 510Radeon HD 6550A
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The NVS 510 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6550A has 512 MB. The NVS 510 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (NVS 510) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 6550A) — the NVS 510 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureNVS 510Radeon HD 6550A
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The NVS 510 draws 68W versus the Radeon HD 6550A's 45W — a 40.7% difference. The Radeon HD 6550A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 510) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6550A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureNVS 510Radeon HD 6550A
TDP
68W
45W-34%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
160mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
10.0
15.7+57%
💰

Value Analysis

The NVS 510 launched at $449 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon HD 6550A launched at $30 and now averages $30. The NVS 510 costs 50% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 45.3 (NVS 510) vs 23.6 (Radeon HD 6550A) — the NVS 510 offers 91.9% better value. The NVS 510 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureNVS 510Radeon HD 6550A
MSRP
$449
$30-93%
Avg Price (30d)
$15-50%
$30
Performance per Dollar
45.3+92%
23.6
Codename
GM107
Onega
Release
November 4 2015
April 19 2011
Ranking
#826
#926