NVS 510 vs Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The NVS 510 is positioned at rank 321 and the Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M is on rank 88, so the Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar NVS 510

#306

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

9783%

#321

NVS 510

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

100%

#322

GRID M60-1Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50

98%

#323

GRID K280Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50

94%

#324

FirePro M2000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

94%

#325

Tesla K20c

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500

92%

#326

GRID M6-1Q

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

91%

#327

Quadro FX 380

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

91%

#328

Tesla C2050 / C2070

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30

91%

#329

FirePro M7740

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

88%

#330

Quadro FX 570

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

86%

#331

RTXA5000-24Q

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100

85%

#332

GRID P40-1Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

85%

#334

Tesla C2050

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95

84%

#335

Tesla M10

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500

84%

#336

FirePro S10000

MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500

83%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

415%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

399%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

394%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

393%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

393%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

390%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

385%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

384%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

380%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

379%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

375%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

374%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

367%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

367%

#73

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

458%

#79

Iris Xe Graphics MAX

MSRP: $55|Avg: $40

83%

#80

GeForce RTX 5090

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $2700

82%

#81

Moore Threads MTT S80

MSRP: $260|Avg: $170

79%

#88

Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#89

GeForce GT 740

MSRP: $89|Avg: $89

92%

#90

Radeon R7 A8-7680

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

91%

#92

Radeon HD 7730

MSRP: $75|Avg: $15

89%

#93

Radeon 540

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

84%

#97

Radeon R7 A8-7690K

MSRP: $80|Avg: $40

82%

#98

GeForce GT 1010

MSRP: $70|Avg: $70

79%

#99

Radeon R7 430

MSRP: $79|Avg: $15

79%

#101

Radeon 550X

MSRP: $109|Avg: $45

77%

#102

GeForce GT 720

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

77%

#103

Radeon R7 240

MSRP: $69|Avg: $15

75%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The NVS 510 is significantly newer (2015 vs 2009). The NVS 510 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the NVS 510 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	NVS 510	Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

NVS 510 Benchmark Check

Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of NVS 510 and Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M

NVS 510

The NVS 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 680 points.

Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M

The Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 699 points. Launch price was $159.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The NVS 510 scores 680 and the Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M reaches 699 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The NVS 510 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (NVS 510) vs 800 (Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M). Raw compute: 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 510) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M).

Feature	NVS 510	Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M
G3D Mark Score	680	699+3%
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	512 ×2	800+56%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.058 TFLOPS ×2	1.36 TFLOPS+29%
ROPs	16 ×2	16
TMUs	32 ×2	40+25%
L1 Cache	256 KB+220%	80 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	NVS 510	Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The NVS 510 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M has 1 GB. The NVS 510 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (NVS 510) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M) — the NVS 510 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	NVS 510	Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The NVS 510 draws 68W versus the Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M's 108W — a 45.5% difference. The NVS 510 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 510) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.