NVS 510 vs Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual

NVS 510

2015Core: 902 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual

2013Core: 720 / 775 MHz
Similar parts
·······

NVS 510 vs Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

NVS 510 vs Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

NVS 510

2015

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 199.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $449 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 4.5 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 36% higher power demand at 68W vs 50W.

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $299 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
  • Delivers 198% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.5 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 68W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
NVS 510 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (680 vs 677), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
NVS 510 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual makes the most sense to buy today. It is $299 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $449, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 198% (4.5 vs 1.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, NVS 510 has the stronger long-term case.

NVS 510 vs Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

NVS 510

The NVS 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 680 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual

The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 677 points.

Graphics Performance

The NVS 510 scores 680 and the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual reaches 677 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 512 (NVS 510) vs 768 (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual).

FeatureNVS 510Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual
G3D Mark Score
680
677
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512 ×2
768+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureNVS 510Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The NVS 510 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual carries 512 MB. NVS 510 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the NVS 510 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual.

FeatureNVS 510Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The NVS 510 draws 68W versus the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual's 50W — a 30.5% difference. The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 510) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureNVS 510Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual
TDP
68W
50W-26%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
160mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
10.0
13.5+35%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the NVS 510 came in at $449, while the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual was 66.6% cheaper ($299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (NVS 510) vs 4.5 (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual) — the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual offers 200% better value. The newer card here is NVS 510 (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureNVS 510Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual
MSRP
$449
$150-67%
Performance per Dollar
1.5
4.5+200%
Codename
GM107
Release
November 4 2015
August 1 2013
Ranking
#826
#881

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.