NVS 510 vs GeForce GT 630
NVS 510
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 630
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The NVS 510 is positioned at rank 321 and the GeForce GT 630 is on rank 126, so the GeForce GT 630 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar NVS 510
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 630
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GT 630 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The GeForce GT 630 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The NVS 510 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 630 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the NVS 510.
| Insight | NVS 510 | GeForce GT 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The NVS 510 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $20 for the GeForce GT 630, it costs 25% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 32.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | NVS 510 | GeForce GT 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+32.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of NVS 510 and GeForce GT 630
NVS 510
The NVS 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 680 points.
GeForce GT 630
The GeForce GT 630 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 685 points.
Graphics Performance
The NVS 510 scores 680 and the GeForce GT 630 reaches 685 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The NVS 510 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GT 630 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 512 (NVS 510) vs 512 (GeForce GT 630). Raw compute: 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 510) vs 1.828 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 630). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1785 MHz.
| Feature | NVS 510 | GeForce GT 630 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 680 | 685 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 ×2 | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 | 1.828 TFLOPS+73% |
| Boost Clock | 1033 MHz | 1785 MHz+73% |
| ROPs | 16 ×2 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 ×2 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | NVS 510 | GeForce GT 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | NVS 510 | GeForce GT 630 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (NVS 510) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 630). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | NVS 510 | GeForce GT 630 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2+20% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (NVS 510) vs None (GeForce GT 630). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) vs PureVideo HD (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (NVS 510) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 630).
| Feature | NVS 510 | GeForce GT 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 1st Gen NVENC | None |
| Decoder | 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) | PureVideo HD (VP5) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The NVS 510 draws 68W versus the GeForce GT 630's 75W — a 9.8% difference. The NVS 510 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 510) vs 300W (GeForce GT 630). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 160mm vs 145mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 78.
| Feature | NVS 510 | GeForce GT 630 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 68W-9% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 160mm | 145mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-17% | 78 |
| Perf/Watt | 10.0+10% | 9.1 |
Value Analysis
The NVS 510 launched at $449 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce GT 630 launched at $69 and now averages $20. The NVS 510 costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 45.3 (NVS 510) vs 34.3 (GeForce GT 630) — the NVS 510 offers 32.1% better value. The GeForce GT 630 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | NVS 510 | GeForce GT 630 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449 | $69-85% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-25% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.3+32% | 34.3 |
| Codename | GM107 | TU117 |
| Release | November 4 2015 | June 28 2022 |
| Ranking | #826 | #444 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on NVS 510 and GeForce GT 630
