NVS 510 vs GeForce RTX 3070
NVS 510
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The NVS 510 is positioned at rank #321 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar NVS 510
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3070 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 3070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The NVS 510 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3160.6% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the NVS 510.
| Insight | NVS 510 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3160.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3160.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $200 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 144.5% better value per dollar than the NVS 510.
| Insight | NVS 510 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+144.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of NVS 510 and GeForce RTX 3070
NVS 510
The NVS 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 680 points.
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the NVS 510 scores 680 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 3160.6%. The NVS 510 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 512 (NVS 510) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 510) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | NVS 510 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 680 | 22,172+3161% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 ×2 | 5888+1050% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 | 20.31 TFLOPS+1820% |
| Boost Clock | 1033 MHz | 1725 MHz+67% |
| ROPs | 16 ×2 | 96+500% |
| TMUs | 32 ×2 | 184+475% |
| L1 Cache | 0.25 MB | 5.8 MB+2220% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | NVS 510 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The NVS 510 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (NVS 510) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | NVS 510 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (NVS 510) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | NVS 510 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (NVS 510) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (NVS 510) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | NVS 510 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 1st Gen NVENC | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The NVS 510 draws 68W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 105.6% difference. The NVS 510 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 510) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | NVS 510 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 68W-69% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 242mm |
| Height | 69mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-13% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 10.0 | 100.8+908% |
Value Analysis
The NVS 510 launched at $449 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 and now averages $200. The NVS 510 costs 92.5% less ($185 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 45.3 (NVS 510) vs 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 144.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | NVS 510 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449-10% | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-93% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.3 | 110.9+145% |
| Codename | GM107 | GA104 |
| Release | November 4 2015 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #826 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on NVS 510 and GeForce RTX 3070
