Quadro FX 500/600 PCI vs Radeon RX 7600
Quadro FX 500/600 PCI
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 7600 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2008). The Radeon RX 7600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 118335.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI.
| Insight | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-118335.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+118335.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $250 versus $500 for the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 236771.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+236771.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 500/600 PCI and Radeon RX 7600
Quadro FX 500/600 PCI
The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI scores 14 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 118335.7%. The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 55 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14 | 16,581+118336% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 2048+753% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS+3396% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9_0a (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9_0a | 12.2+36% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI draws 189W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 13.6% difference. The Radeon RX 7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 165W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 100.5+100400% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 and now averages $250. The Radeon RX 7600 costs 50% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.0 (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 100+% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 500/600 PCI | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $269 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $250-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 66.3 |
| Codename | GT200B | Navi 33 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #815 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 500/600 PCI and Radeon RX 7600
