Quadro FX 500/600 PCI vs GRID V100-8Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GRID V100-8Q is significantly newer (2016 vs 2008). The GRID V100-8Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID V100-8Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 14.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro FX 500/600 PCI	GRID V100-8Q
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-14.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+14.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+700%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI holds the technical lead. Priced at $500 (vs $10,000), it costs 95% less, resulting in a 1650% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro FX 500/600 PCI	GRID V100-8Q
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+1650%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($500)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($10,000)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro FX 500/600 PCI Benchmark Check

GRID V100-8Q Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 500/600 PCI and GRID V100-8Q

Quadro FX 500/600 PCI

The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14 points. Launch price was $3,499.

GRID V100-8Q

The GRID V100-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI scores 14 versus the GRID V100-8Q's 16 — the GRID V100-8Q leads by 14.3%. The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GRID V100-8Q uses Maxwell, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 640 (GRID V100-8Q). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID V100-8Q).

Feature	Quadro FX 500/600 PCI	GRID V100-8Q
G3D Mark Score	14	16+14%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Maxwell
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	240	640+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	1.672 TFLOPS+169%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+100%	40
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 500/600 PCI	GRID V100-8Q
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID V100-8Q has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 2 MB (GRID V100-8Q) — the GRID V100-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 500/600 PCI	GRID V100-8Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI draws 189W versus the GRID V100-8Q's 225W — a 17.4% difference. The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 350W (GRID V100-8Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro FX 500/600 PCI	GRID V100-8Q
TDP	189W-16%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Slots	1	—
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GRID V100-8Q launched at $10000 and now averages $10000. The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI costs 95% less ($9500 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.0 (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) vs 0.0 (GRID V100-8Q) — the GRID V100-8Q offers 0% better value. The GRID V100-8Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2008).