
Quadro FX 540 vs Radeon HD 2350

Quadro FX 540
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 2350
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 540 is positioned at rank 397 and the Radeon HD 2350 is on rank 322, so the Radeon HD 2350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 540
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 2350
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 540 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 2350 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 540 | Radeon HD 2350 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro FX 540 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 540 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $48), it costs 69% less, resulting in a 236.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 540 | Radeon HD 2350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+236.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($48) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 540 and Radeon HD 2350

Quadro FX 540
The Quadro FX 540 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 81 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 2350
The Radeon HD 2350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 77 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 540 scores 81 versus the Radeon HD 2350's 77 — the Quadro FX 540 leads by 5.2%. The Quadro FX 540 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 2350 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 540) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 2350). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 540) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2350).
| Feature | Quadro FX 540 | Radeon HD 2350 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 81+5% | 77 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 1792+647% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 2.867 TFLOPS+361% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 112+40% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 540 | Radeon HD 2350 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 540 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 2350 has 256 MB. The Radeon HD 2350 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 540) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 2350) — the Radeon HD 2350 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 540 | Radeon HD 2350 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.25 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 540 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 2350's 200W — a 5.7% difference. The Quadro FX 540 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 540) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2350). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro FX 540 | Radeon HD 2350 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W-6% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4 | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 540 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon HD 2350 launched at $50 and now averages $48. The Quadro FX 540 costs 68.8% less ($33 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.4 (Quadro FX 540) vs 1.6 (Radeon HD 2350) — the Quadro FX 540 offers 237.5% better value. The Radeon HD 2350 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 540 | Radeon HD 2350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $50-83% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-69% | $48 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.4+238% | 1.6 |
| Codename | GT200B | Tahiti |
| Release | November 11 2008 | January 31 2012 |
| Ranking | #815 | #454 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















