Quadro FX 540 vs Radeon HD 2350

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 540

2008Core: 610 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 2350

2012Boost: 1250 MHz

Quadro FX 540 vs Radeon HD 2350 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 540 vs Radeon HD 2350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 540 vs Radeon HD 2350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 540

2008

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 498% HIGHER MSRP
    $299 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 2350

2012

Why buy it

  • Costs $249 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • Delivers 468.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 540 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 5.2% in PassMark G3D (81 vs 77), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX 540 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 2350 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $249 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 468.5% (1.5 vs 0.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 2350 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 540 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 540 vs Radeon HD 2350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 540

The Quadro FX 540 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 81 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon HD 2350

The Radeon HD 2350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 77 points. Launch price was $449.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 540 scores 81 versus the Radeon HD 2350's 77 — the Quadro FX 540 leads by 5.2%. The Quadro FX 540 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 2350 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 540) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 2350). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 540) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2350).

FeatureQuadro FX 540Radeon HD 2350
G3D Mark Score
81+5%
77
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
240
1792+647%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
2.867 TFLOPS+361%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
112+40%
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 540Radeon HD 2350
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 540 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 2350 carries 256 MB. Radeon HD 2350 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 540 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 2350. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 540) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 2350) — the Radeon HD 2350 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 540Radeon HD 2350
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
0.25 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 540 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 2350's 200W — a 5.7% difference. The Quadro FX 540 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 540) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2350). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro FX 540Radeon HD 2350
TDP
189W-6%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt
0.4
0.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 540 came in at $299, while the Radeon HD 2350 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 2350 was 83.3% cheaper ($249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (Quadro FX 540) vs 1.5 (Radeon HD 2350) — the Radeon HD 2350 offers 400% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 2350 (2012 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 540Radeon HD 2350
MSRP
$299
$50-83%
Performance per Dollar
0.3
1.5+400%
Codename
GT200B
Tahiti
Release
November 11 2008
January 31 2012
Ranking
#815
#454

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.