Quadro FX 540 vs RADEON X800GT
Quadro FX 540
Popular choices:
RADEON X800GT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 540 is positioned at rank 397 and the RADEON X800GT is on rank 352, so the RADEON X800GT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 540
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X800GT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X800GT is significantly newer (2020 vs 2008). The RADEON X800GT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 540 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 540 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON X800GT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 540 | RADEON X800GT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON X800GT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $15 for the Quadro FX 540, it costs 33% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 48.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 540 | RADEON X800GT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+48.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 540 and RADEON X800GT
Quadro FX 540
The Quadro FX 540 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 81 points. Launch price was $3,499.
RADEON X800GT
The RADEON X800GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 80 points. Launch price was $579.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 540 scores 81 and the RADEON X800GT reaches 80 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 540 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the RADEON X800GT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 540) vs 3,840 (RADEON X800GT). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 540) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (RADEON X800GT).
| Feature | Quadro FX 540 | RADEON X800GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 81+1% | 80 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 3840+1500% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS+2499% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 80 | 240+200% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 540 | RADEON X800GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 540 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X800GT has 512 MB. The RADEON X800GT offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 540) vs 4 MB (RADEON X800GT) — the RADEON X800GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 540 | RADEON X800GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 540 draws 189W versus the RADEON X800GT's 250W — a 27.8% difference. The Quadro FX 540 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 540) vs 350W (RADEON X800GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Quadro FX 540 | RADEON X800GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W-24% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4+33% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 540 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the RADEON X800GT launched at $160 and now averages $10. The RADEON X800GT costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.4 (Quadro FX 540) vs 8.0 (RADEON X800GT) — the RADEON X800GT offers 48.1% better value. The RADEON X800GT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 540 | RADEON X800GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $160-46% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $10-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.4 | 8.0+48% |
| Codename | GT200B | Navi 21 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #815 | #65 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 540 and RADEON X800GT
