Quadro FX 370 vs Quadro FX 540

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 370

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 540

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro FX 370 vs Quadro FX 540 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 370 vs Quadro FX 540 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 370 vs Quadro FX 540: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 370

2008

Why buy it

  • Costs $170 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • Delivers 140.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 540

2008

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 131.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $299 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 370 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (84 vs 81), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX 370 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 256 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 370 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $170 cheaper on MSRP at $129 vs $299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 140.4% (0.7 vs 0.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Quadro FX 370 vs Quadro FX 540 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 370

The Quadro FX 370 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 84 points. Launch price was $3,499.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 540

The Quadro FX 540 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 81 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 370 scores 84 and the Quadro FX 540 reaches 81 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 370 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro FX 540 uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 370) vs 240 (Quadro FX 540). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 370) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 540).

FeatureQuadro FX 370Quadro FX 540
G3D Mark Score
84+4%
81
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
55 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
240
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
80
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 370Quadro FX 540
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 370 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 540 carries 128 MB. Quadro FX 370 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 370 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 540.

FeatureQuadro FX 370Quadro FX 540
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB+100%
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 370 draws 189W versus the Quadro FX 540's 189W — a 0% difference. The Quadro FX 540 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 370) vs 350W (Quadro FX 540). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro FX 370Quadro FX 540
TDP
189W
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
0.4
0.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 370 came in at $129, while the Quadro FX 540 launched at $299. On MSRP, Quadro FX 370 was 56.9% cheaper ($170 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.7 (Quadro FX 370) vs 0.3 (Quadro FX 540) — the Quadro FX 370 offers 133.3% better value.

FeatureQuadro FX 370Quadro FX 540
MSRP
$129-57%
$299
Performance per Dollar
0.7+133%
0.3
Codename
GT200B
GT200B
Release
November 11 2008
November 11 2008
Ranking
#815
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.