
nForce 750a SLI

Quadro FX 370
nForce 750a SLI vs Quadro FX 370 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
nForce 750a SLI vs Quadro FX 370 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
nForce 750a SLI vs Quadro FX 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
nForce 750a SLI
2013Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 189W, a 159W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 168mm, a 167mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
Quadro FX 370
2008Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌530% higher power demand at 189W vs 30W.
- ❌16700% longer card at 168mm vs 1mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
nForce 750a SLI vs Quadro FX 370 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
nForce 750a SLI
The nForce 750a SLI is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 967 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 83 points.

Quadro FX 370
The Quadro FX 370 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 84 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The nForce 750a SLI scores 83 and the Quadro FX 370 reaches 84 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The nForce 750a SLI is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 370 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 768 (nForce 750a SLI) vs 240 (Quadro FX 370).
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 83 | 84+1% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+220% | 240 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The nForce 750a SLI has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 370 carries 256 MB. nForce 750a SLI gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the nForce 750a SLI and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 370.
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10_0 (nForce 750a SLI) vs 10.0 (Quadro FX 370). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10_0 | 10.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (nForce 750a SLI) vs None (Quadro FX 370). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs PureVideo 2.
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD | PureVideo 2 |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The nForce 750a SLI draws 30W versus the Quadro FX 370's 189W — a 145.2% difference. The nForce 750a SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (nForce 750a SLI) vs 350W (Quadro FX 370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-84% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 2.8+600% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the nForce 750a SLI came in at $0, while the Quadro FX 370 launched at $129. On MSRP, nForce 750a SLI was 100+% cheaper ($129 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (nForce 750a SLI) vs 0.7 (Quadro FX 370) — the nForce 750a SLI offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is nForce 750a SLI (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $129 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.7 |
| Codename | N14P-GT | GT200B |
| Release | April 1 2013 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #616 | #815 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















