nForce 750a SLI vs Quadro FX 370

nForce 750a SLI

2013Core: 967 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 370

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

nForce 750a SLI vs Quadro FX 370 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

nForce 750a SLI vs Quadro FX 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

nForce 750a SLI

2013

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Draws 30W instead of 189W, a 159W reduction.
  • Measures 1mm instead of 168mm, a 167mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

Quadro FX 370

2008

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 530% higher power demand at 189W vs 30W.
  • 16700% longer card at 168mm vs 1mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 370 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (84 vs 83), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
nForce 750a SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 370 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 370 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, nForce 750a SLI has the stronger long-term case.

nForce 750a SLI vs Quadro FX 370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

nForce 750a SLI

The nForce 750a SLI is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 967 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 83 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 370

The Quadro FX 370 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 84 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The nForce 750a SLI scores 83 and the Quadro FX 370 reaches 84 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The nForce 750a SLI is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 370 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 768 (nForce 750a SLI) vs 240 (Quadro FX 370).

FeaturenForce 750a SLIQuadro FX 370
G3D Mark Score
83
84+1%
Architecture
Kepler
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
768+220%
240

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeaturenForce 750a SLIQuadro FX 370
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The nForce 750a SLI has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 370 carries 256 MB. nForce 750a SLI gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the nForce 750a SLI and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 370.

FeaturenForce 750a SLIQuadro FX 370
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10_0 (nForce 750a SLI) vs 10.0 (Quadro FX 370). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeaturenForce 750a SLIQuadro FX 370
DirectX
10_0
10.0
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (nForce 750a SLI) vs None (Quadro FX 370). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs PureVideo 2.

FeaturenForce 750a SLIQuadro FX 370
Encoder
PureVideo HD
None
Decoder
PureVideo HD
PureVideo 2
Codecs
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The nForce 750a SLI draws 30W versus the Quadro FX 370's 189W — a 145.2% difference. The nForce 750a SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (nForce 750a SLI) vs 350W (Quadro FX 370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeaturenForce 750a SLIQuadro FX 370
TDP
30W-84%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Perf/Watt
2.8+600%
0.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the nForce 750a SLI came in at $0, while the Quadro FX 370 launched at $129. On MSRP, nForce 750a SLI was 100+% cheaper ($129 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (nForce 750a SLI) vs 0.7 (Quadro FX 370) — the nForce 750a SLI offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is nForce 750a SLI (2013 vs 2008).

FeaturenForce 750a SLIQuadro FX 370
MSRP
$0-100%
$129
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
0.7
Codename
N14P-GT
GT200B
Release
April 1 2013
November 11 2008
Ranking
#616
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.