Mobility Radeon HD 2400 vs nForce 750a SLI

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 vs nForce 750a SLI FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 vs nForce 750a SLI: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400

2009

Why buy it

✅+8.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2009 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

nForce 750a SLI

2013

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (83 vs 90).
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $79 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 8.4% in PassMark G3D (90 vs 83), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 vs nForce 750a SLI Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400

The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 90 points.

nForce 750a SLI

The nForce 750a SLI is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 967 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 83 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 scores 90 versus the nForce 750a SLI's 83 — the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 leads by 8.4%. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is built on TeraScale while the nForce 750a SLI uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400) vs 768 (nForce 750a SLI).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400	nForce 750a SLI
G3D Mark Score	90+8%	83
Architecture	TeraScale	Kepler
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	800+4%	768

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400	nForce 750a SLI
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the nForce 750a SLI carries 512 MB. nForce 750a SLI gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 and 64-bit on the nForce 750a SLI.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400	nForce 750a SLI
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400) vs 10_0 (nForce 750a SLI). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400	nForce 750a SLI
DirectX	10.0	10_0
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Avivo HD (Mobility Radeon HD 2400) vs PureVideo HD (nForce 750a SLI). Decoder: UVD 1.0 vs PureVideo HD.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400	nForce 750a SLI
Encoder	Avivo HD	PureVideo HD
Decoder	UVD 1.0	PureVideo HD
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 draws 30W versus the nForce 750a SLI's 30W — a 0% difference. The nForce 750a SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2400) vs 350W (nForce 750a SLI). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400	nForce 750a SLI
TDP	30W	30W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	1mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	85	—
Perf/Watt	3.0+7%	2.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 came in at $79, while the nForce 750a SLI launched at $0. On MSRP, nForce 750a SLI was 100+% cheaper ($79 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400) vs Infinity (nForce 750a SLI) — the nForce 750a SLI offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is nForce 750a SLI (2013 vs 2009).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2400	nForce 750a SLI
MSRP	$79	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	1.1	Infinity
Codename	M98	N14P-GT
Release	January 9 2009	April 1 2013
Ranking	#927	#616

Search Mobility Radeon HD 2400 on Amazon

Search nForce 750a SLI on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.