nForce 750a SLI vs Quadro FX 350
nForce 750a SLI
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 350
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 350
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 350 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the nForce 750a SLI offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | nForce 750a SLI | Quadro FX 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 350 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of nForce 750a SLI and Quadro FX 350
nForce 750a SLI
The nForce 750a SLI is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 967 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 83 points.
Quadro FX 350
The Quadro FX 350 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 86 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The nForce 750a SLI scores 83 and the Quadro FX 350 reaches 86 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The nForce 750a SLI is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 350 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 768 (nForce 750a SLI) vs 240 (Quadro FX 350).
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | Quadro FX 350 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 83 | 86+4% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+220% | 240 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | Quadro FX 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The nForce 750a SLI comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 350 has 128 MB. The nForce 750a SLI offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | Quadro FX 350 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The nForce 750a SLI draws 30W versus the Quadro FX 350's 189W — a 145.2% difference. The nForce 750a SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (nForce 750a SLI) vs 350W (Quadro FX 350). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | Quadro FX 350 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-84% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.8+460% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The nForce 750a SLI launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Quadro FX 350 launched at $199 and now averages $15. The nForce 750a SLI costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (nForce 750a SLI) vs 5.7 (Quadro FX 350) — the nForce 750a SLI offers Infinity% better value. The nForce 750a SLI is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | Quadro FX 350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 5.7 |
| Codename | N14P-GT | GT200B |
| Release | April 1 2013 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #616 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on nForce 750a SLI and Quadro FX 350
