nForce 750a SLI vs Radeon X1650 Pro
nForce 750a SLI
Popular choices:
Radeon X1650 Pro
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1650 Pro
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1650 Pro is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The Radeon X1650 Pro likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The nForce 750a SLI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon X1650 Pro is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the nForce 750a SLI.
| Insight | nForce 750a SLI | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon X1650 Pro remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of nForce 750a SLI and Radeon X1650 Pro
nForce 750a SLI
The nForce 750a SLI is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 967 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 83 points.
Radeon X1650 Pro
The Radeon X1650 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The nForce 750a SLI scores 83 and the Radeon X1650 Pro reaches 85 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The nForce 750a SLI is built on Kepler while the Radeon X1650 Pro uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 768 (nForce 750a SLI) vs 2,560 (Radeon X1650 Pro).
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 83 | 85+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2560+233% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The nForce 750a SLI draws 30W versus the Radeon X1650 Pro's 250W — a 157.1% difference. The nForce 750a SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (nForce 750a SLI) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 Pro). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-88% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.8+833% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The nForce 750a SLI launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon X1650 Pro launched at $100 and now averages $15. The nForce 750a SLI costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (nForce 750a SLI) vs 5.7 (Radeon X1650 Pro) — the nForce 750a SLI offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon X1650 Pro is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 5.7 |
| Codename | N14P-GT | Navi 22 |
| Release | April 1 2013 | October 17 2023 |
| Ranking | #616 | #92 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on nForce 750a SLI and Radeon X1650 Pro
