CPU
GPU
nForce 750a SLI
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 3200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The nForce 750a SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 3200.
| Insight | nForce 750a SLI | Radeon HD 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the nForce 750a SLI remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of nForce 750a SLI and Radeon HD 3200
nForce 750a SLI
The nForce 750a SLI is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 967 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 83 points.
Radeon HD 3200
The Radeon HD 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points. Launch price was $180.
Graphics Performance
The nForce 750a SLI scores 83 and the Radeon HD 3200 reaches 82 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The nForce 750a SLI is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 3200 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (nForce 750a SLI) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 3200).
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | Radeon HD 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 83+1% | 82 |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1280+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | Radeon HD 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | Radeon HD 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10_0 (nForce 750a SLI) vs 10.0 (Radeon HD 3200). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | Radeon HD 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10_0 | 10.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (nForce 750a SLI) vs UVD (Radeon HD 3200). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs UVD.
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | Radeon HD 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD | UVD |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD | UVD |
Power & Dimensions
The nForce 750a SLI draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 3200's 186W — a 144.4% difference. The nForce 750a SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (nForce 750a SLI) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | Radeon HD 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-84% | 186W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 2.8+600% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
The nForce 750a SLI launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon HD 3200 launched at $50 and now averages $10. The nForce 750a SLI costs 100+% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (nForce 750a SLI) vs 8.2 (Radeon HD 3200) — the nForce 750a SLI offers Infinity% better value. The nForce 750a SLI is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | Radeon HD 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 8.2 |
| Codename | N14P-GT | Cayman |
| Release | April 1 2013 | December 1 2011 |
| Ranking | #616 | #598 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on nForce 750a SLI and Radeon HD 3200
