
Mobility Radeon HD 2400

Quadro FX 370
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 vs Quadro FX 370 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 vs Quadro FX 370 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 vs Quadro FX 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Mobility Radeon HD 2400
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 75% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.1 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 189W, a 159W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2009 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro FX 370
2008Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌63.3% HIGHER MSRP$129 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
- ❌530% higher power demand at 189W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 vs Quadro FX 370 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400
The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 90 points.

Quadro FX 370
The Quadro FX 370 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 84 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 scores 90 versus the Quadro FX 370's 84 — the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 leads by 7.1%. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is built on TeraScale while the Quadro FX 370 uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400) vs 240 (Quadro FX 370). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 2400) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 370).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 90+7% | 84 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+233% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS+41% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 370.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400) vs 10.0 (Quadro FX 370). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3+57% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Avivo HD (Mobility Radeon HD 2400) vs None (Quadro FX 370). Decoder: UVD 1.0 vs PureVideo 2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400) vs MPEG-2 (Quadro FX 370).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Avivo HD | None |
| Decoder | UVD 1.0 | PureVideo 2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 draws 30W versus the Quadro FX 370's 189W — a 145.2% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2400) vs 350W (Quadro FX 370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-84% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.0+650% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 came in at $79, while the Quadro FX 370 launched at $129. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 2400 was 38.8% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400) vs 0.7 (Quadro FX 370) — the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 offers 57.1% better value. The newer card here is Mobility Radeon HD 2400 (2009 vs 2008).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2400 | Quadro FX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $79-39% | $129 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.1+57% | 0.7 |
| Codename | M98 | GT200B |
| Release | January 9 2009 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #927 | #815 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














