Quadro FX 370 vs Radeon X1650 Pro
Quadro FX 370
Popular choices:
Radeon X1650 Pro
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 370 is positioned at rank 373 and the Radeon X1650 Pro is on rank 334, so the Radeon X1650 Pro offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 370
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1650 Pro
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1650 Pro is significantly newer (2023 vs 2008). The Radeon X1650 Pro likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 370 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon X1650 Pro is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 370.
| Insight | Quadro FX 370 | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon X1650 Pro offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $500 for the Quadro FX 370, it costs 97% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 3273% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 370 | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3273%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 370 and Radeon X1650 Pro
Quadro FX 370
The Quadro FX 370 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 84 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Radeon X1650 Pro
The Radeon X1650 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 370 scores 84 and the Radeon X1650 Pro reaches 85 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 370 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon X1650 Pro uses RDNA 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 370) vs 2,560 (Radeon X1650 Pro).
| Feature | Quadro FX 370 | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 84 | 85+1% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 2560+967% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 160+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 370 | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 370 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1650 Pro has 512 MB. The Radeon X1650 Pro offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro FX 370 | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 370 draws 189W versus the Radeon X1650 Pro's 250W — a 27.8% difference. The Quadro FX 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 370) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 Pro). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro FX 370 | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W-24% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4+33% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 370 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon X1650 Pro launched at $100 and now averages $15. The Radeon X1650 Pro costs 97% less ($485 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.2 (Quadro FX 370) vs 5.7 (Radeon X1650 Pro) — the Radeon X1650 Pro offers 2750% better value. The Radeon X1650 Pro is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 370 | Radeon X1650 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $100-22% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $15-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.2 | 5.7+2750% |
| Codename | GT200B | Navi 22 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | October 17 2023 |
| Ranking | #815 | #92 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 370 and Radeon X1650 Pro
