Quadro FX 370 vs GeForce 8600M GS
Quadro FX 370
Popular choices:
GeForce 8600M GS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 370 is positioned at rank 373 and the GeForce 8600M GS is on rank 702, so the Quadro FX 370 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 370
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8600M GS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 8600M GS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 370.
| Insight | Quadro FX 370 | GeForce 8600M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 8600M GS offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 8600M GS holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $500), it costs 96% less, resulting in a 2548.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 370 | GeForce 8600M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2548.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 370 and GeForce 8600M GS
Quadro FX 370
The Quadro FX 370 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 84 points. Launch price was $3,499.
GeForce 8600M GS
The GeForce 8600M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 89 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 370 scores 84 versus the GeForce 8600M GS's 89 — the GeForce 8600M GS leads by 6%. The Quadro FX 370 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce 8600M GS uses G9x, both on 55 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 370) vs 224 (GeForce 8600M GS).
| Feature | Quadro FX 370 | GeForce 8600M GS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 84 | 89+6% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | G9x |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 240+7% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 370 | GeForce 8600M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro FX 370 | GeForce 8600M GS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (Quadro FX 370) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 8600M GS). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro FX 370 | GeForce 8600M GS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 11.1 (10_0)+11% |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3+57% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Quadro FX 370) vs None (GeForce 8600M GS). Decoder: PureVideo 2 vs PureVideo HD (VP2). Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (Quadro FX 370) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 8600M GS).
| Feature | Quadro FX 370 | GeForce 8600M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo 2 | PureVideo HD (VP2) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 370 draws 189W versus the GeForce 8600M GS's 150W — a 23% difference. The GeForce 8600M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 370) vs 350W (GeForce 8600M GS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro FX 370 | GeForce 8600M GS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 150W-21% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4 | 0.6+50% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 370 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GeForce 8600M GS launched at $100 and now averages $20. The GeForce 8600M GS costs 96% less ($480 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.2 (Quadro FX 370) vs 4.5 (GeForce 8600M GS) — the GeForce 8600M GS offers 2150% better value.
| Feature | Quadro FX 370 | GeForce 8600M GS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $100-22% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $20-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.2 | 4.5+2150% |
| Codename | GT200B | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | November 11 2008 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #815 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 370 and GeForce 8600M GS
