Quadro FX 370 vs GeForce 7500 LE

Quadro FX 370

2008Core: 610 MHz

GeForce 7500 LE

2013Core: 967 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

GeForce GTX 970

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

+1.2%

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

GeForce GTX 970

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 370 is positioned at rank 373 and the GeForce 7500 LE is on rank 677, so the Quadro FX 370 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 370

#358

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

22728%

#373

Quadro FX 370

MSRP: $129|Avg: $500

100%

#374

Quadro 6000

MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150

94%

#375

RTXA5000-6Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500

94%

#376

GRID M6-0B

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

94%

#377

GRID M10-1B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150

92%

#378

Tesla K40c

MSRP: $7699|Avg: $500

89%

#379

Quadro FX 4800

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $80

86%

#380

Tesla M2090

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $40

86%

#381

GRID K2

MSRP: $5199|Avg: $80

82%

#382

GRID K180Q

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $1000

82%

#383

Quadro CX

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $500

72%

#384

GRID P100-8Q

MSRP: $7374|Avg: $550

68%

#385

Quadro FX 350

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

66%

#386

Quadro FX 550

MSRP: $150|Avg: $10

66%

#387

Tesla M2070

MSRP: $3099|Avg: $50

65%

#388

GRID V100D-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

65%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7500 LE

#667

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

7646%

#669

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

6931%

#670

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

6913%

#674

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

6286%

#675

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

6243%

#677

GeForce 7500 LE

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

100%

#678

Radeon HD 2600 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $40

100%

#679

GeForce 9650M GT

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

96%

#680

GeForce 8400 SE

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

96%

#681

GeForce 9650M GS

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

96%

#682

GeForce 8400M GT

MSRP: $50|Avg: $30

94%

#683

Mobility Radeon HD 3410

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

91%

#684

GeForce 9200M GS

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

91%

#685

MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

86%

#686

GeForce 9300M GS

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

83%

#687

Mobility Radeon HD 2400

MSRP: $79|Avg: $1

80%

#688

GeForce 6150 LE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $10

77%

#689

Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2

MSRP: $449|Avg: $50

75%

#690

GeForce 9450

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

74%

#691

GeForce 9800 GX2

MSRP: $599|Avg: $75

72%

#692

GeForce 7900 GS

MSRP: $259|Avg: $50

71%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 7500 LE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 370.

Insight	Quadro FX 370	GeForce 7500 LE
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 7500 LE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 7500 LE holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $500), it costs 97% less, resulting in a 3273% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro FX 370	GeForce 7500 LE
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+3273%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)	✅More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro FX 370 Benchmark Check

GeForce 7500 LE Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 370 and GeForce 7500 LE

Quadro FX 370

The Quadro FX 370 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 84 points. Launch price was $3,499.

GeForce 7500 LE

The GeForce 7500 LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 967 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 85 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 370 scores 84 and the GeForce 7500 LE reaches 85 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 370 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce 7500 LE uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 370) vs 768 (GeForce 7500 LE).

Feature	Quadro FX 370	GeForce 7500 LE
G3D Mark Score	84	85+1%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	240	768+220%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 370	GeForce 7500 LE
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Quadro FX 370	GeForce 7500 LE
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (Quadro FX 370) vs 9.0c (GeForce 7500 LE). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Quadro FX 370	GeForce 7500 LE
DirectX	10.0+11%	9.0c
Vulkan	N/A	None
OpenGL	2.1	2.1
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Quadro FX 370) vs No (GeForce 7500 LE). Decoder: PureVideo 2 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (Quadro FX 370) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce 7500 LE).

Feature	Quadro FX 370	GeForce 7500 LE
Encoder	None	No
Decoder	PureVideo 2	PureVideo
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 370 draws 189W versus the GeForce 7500 LE's 30W — a 145.2% difference. The GeForce 7500 LE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 370) vs 350W (GeForce 7500 LE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

Feature	Quadro FX 370	GeForce 7500 LE
TDP	189W	30W-84%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	168mm	168mm
Height	111mm	106mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	—	65°C
Perf/Watt	0.4	2.8+600%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro FX 370 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GeForce 7500 LE launched at $60 and now averages $15. The GeForce 7500 LE costs 97% less ($485 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.2 (Quadro FX 370) vs 5.7 (GeForce 7500 LE) — the GeForce 7500 LE offers 2750% better value. The GeForce 7500 LE is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).