Quadro FX 370 vs nForce 750a SLI

Quadro FX 370

2008Core: 610 MHz

nForce 750a SLI

2013Core: 967 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

+1.2%

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

GeForce GTX 970

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

nForce 750a SLI

0.0%

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

GeForce Go 7300

Mobility Radeon HD 3410

Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

Radeon R9 Fury

Radeon RX 5700

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro FX 370 is positioned at rank #373 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 370

#358

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

22728%

#373

Quadro FX 370

MSRP: $129|Avg: $500

100%

#374

Quadro 6000

MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150

94%

#375

RTXA5000-6Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500

94%

#376

GRID M6-0B

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

94%

#377

GRID M10-1B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150

92%

#378

Tesla K40c

MSRP: $7699|Avg: $500

89%

#379

Quadro FX 4800

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $80

86%

#380

Tesla M2090

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $40

86%

#381

GRID K2

MSRP: $5199|Avg: $80

82%

#382

GRID K180Q

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $1000

82%

#383

Quadro CX

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $500

72%

#384

GRID P100-8Q

MSRP: $7374|Avg: $550

68%

#385

Quadro FX 350

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

66%

#386

Quadro FX 550

MSRP: $150|Avg: $10

66%

#387

Tesla M2070

MSRP: $3099|Avg: $50

65%

#388

GRID V100D-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

65%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 370 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the nForce 750a SLI offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro FX 370	nForce 750a SLI
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 370 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro FX 370 Benchmark Check

nForce 750a SLI Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 370 and nForce 750a SLI

Quadro FX 370

The Quadro FX 370 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 84 points. Launch price was $3,499.

nForce 750a SLI

The nForce 750a SLI is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 967 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 83 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 370 scores 84 and the nForce 750a SLI reaches 83 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 370 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the nForce 750a SLI uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 370) vs 768 (nForce 750a SLI).

Feature	Quadro FX 370	nForce 750a SLI
G3D Mark Score	84+1%	83
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	240	768+220%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 370	nForce 750a SLI
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 370 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the nForce 750a SLI has 512 MB. The nForce 750a SLI offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Quadro FX 370	nForce 750a SLI
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (Quadro FX 370) vs 10_0 (nForce 750a SLI). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Quadro FX 370	nForce 750a SLI
DirectX	10.0	10_0
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Quadro FX 370) vs PureVideo HD (nForce 750a SLI). Decoder: PureVideo 2 vs PureVideo HD.

Feature	Quadro FX 370	nForce 750a SLI
Encoder	None	PureVideo HD
Decoder	PureVideo 2	PureVideo HD
Codecs	MPEG-2	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 370 draws 189W versus the nForce 750a SLI's 30W — a 145.2% difference. The nForce 750a SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 370) vs 350W (nForce 750a SLI). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Quadro FX 370	nForce 750a SLI
TDP	189W	30W-84%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	1mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Perf/Watt	0.4	2.8+600%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro FX 370 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the nForce 750a SLI launched at $0 and now averages $0. The nForce 750a SLI costs 100+% less ($500 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.2 (Quadro FX 370) vs Infinity (nForce 750a SLI) — the nForce 750a SLI offers Infinity% better value. The nForce 750a SLI is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).