Quadro FX 370 vs Radeon HD 3200

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 370

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 3200

2011Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro FX 370 vs Radeon HD 3200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 370 vs Radeon HD 3200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 370 vs Radeon HD 3200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 370

2008

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 158% HIGHER MSRP
    $129 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • 16700% longer card at 168mm vs 1mm.

Radeon HD 3200

2011

Why buy it

  • Costs $79 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • Delivers 151.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Measures 1mm instead of 168mm, a 167mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 370 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (84 vs 82), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX 370 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 3200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $79 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 151.9% (1.6 vs 0.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 3200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 370 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 370 vs Radeon HD 3200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 370

The Quadro FX 370 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 84 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon HD 3200

The Radeon HD 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points. Launch price was $180.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 370 scores 84 and the Radeon HD 3200 reaches 82 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 370 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 3200 uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 370) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 3200). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 370) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3200).

FeatureQuadro FX 370Radeon HD 3200
G3D Mark Score
84+2%
82
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TeraScale 3
Process Node
55 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
240
1280+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
1.92 TFLOPS+209%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
80
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 370Radeon HD 3200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 370 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 3200 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 3200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 370 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3200. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 370) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 3200) — the Radeon HD 3200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 370Radeon HD 3200
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (Quadro FX 370) vs 10.0 (Radeon HD 3200). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureQuadro FX 370Radeon HD 3200
DirectX
10.0
10.0
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Quadro FX 370) vs UVD (Radeon HD 3200). Decoder: PureVideo 2 vs UVD.

FeatureQuadro FX 370Radeon HD 3200
Encoder
None
UVD
Decoder
PureVideo 2
UVD
Codecs
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 370 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 3200's 186W — a 1.6% difference. The Radeon HD 3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 370) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureQuadro FX 370Radeon HD 3200
TDP
189W
186W-2%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
168mm
1mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Perf/Watt
0.4
0.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 370 came in at $129, while the Radeon HD 3200 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 3200 was 61.2% cheaper ($79 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.7 (Quadro FX 370) vs 1.6 (Radeon HD 3200) — the Radeon HD 3200 offers 128.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 3200 (2011 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 370Radeon HD 3200
MSRP
$129
$50-61%
Performance per Dollar
0.7
1.6+129%
Codename
GT200B
Cayman
Release
November 11 2008
December 1 2011
Ranking
#815
#598

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.