
Quadro FX 5500

Radeon HD 8280E
Quadro FX 5500 vs Radeon HD 8280E Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro FX 5500 vs Radeon HD 8280E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro FX 5500 vs Radeon HD 8280E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro FX 5500
2008Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8280E across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1899.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.
Radeon HD 8280E
2013Why buy it
- ✅0.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,849 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2015% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.7 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 5500 vs Radeon HD 8280E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 5500
The Quadro FX 5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 242 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 8280E
The Radeon HD 8280E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 256 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 5500 scores 242 versus the Radeon HD 8280E's 256 — the Radeon HD 8280E leads by 5.8%. The Quadro FX 5500 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8280E uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 5500) vs 640 (Radeon HD 8280E). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 5500) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8280E).
| Feature | Quadro FX 5500 | Radeon HD 8280E |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 242 | 256+6% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 640+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 0.992 TFLOPS+59% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 5500 | Radeon HD 8280E |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 5500 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8280E carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 5500 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 5500 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8280E.
| Feature | Quadro FX 5500 | Radeon HD 8280E |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 5500 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 8280E's 50W — a 116.3% difference. The Radeon HD 8280E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 5500) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8280E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro FX 5500 | Radeon HD 8280E |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 50W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.3 | 5.1+292% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro FX 5500 came in at $2999, while the Radeon HD 8280E launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8280E was 95% cheaper ($2849 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (Quadro FX 5500) vs 1.7 (Radeon HD 8280E) — the Radeon HD 8280E offers 1600% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 8280E (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 5500 | Radeon HD 8280E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2999 | $150-95% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 1.7+1600% |
| Codename | GT200B | Venus |
| Release | November 11 2008 | April 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #815 | #745 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














