
Quadro FX 5500 vs Radeon HD 8280E

Quadro FX 5500
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8280E
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 5500 is positioned at rank 418 and the Radeon HD 8280E is on rank 662, so the Quadro FX 5500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 5500
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8280E
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8280E is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 5500 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 5500 | Radeon HD 8280E |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro FX 5500 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 5500 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $110), it costs 73% less, resulting in a 246.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 5500 | Radeon HD 8280E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+246.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($110) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 5500 and Radeon HD 8280E

Quadro FX 5500
The Quadro FX 5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 242 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 8280E
The Radeon HD 8280E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 256 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 5500 scores 242 versus the Radeon HD 8280E's 256 — the Radeon HD 8280E leads by 5.8%. The Quadro FX 5500 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8280E uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 5500) vs 640 (Radeon HD 8280E). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 5500) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8280E).
| Feature | Quadro FX 5500 | Radeon HD 8280E |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 242 | 256+6% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 640+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 0.992 TFLOPS+59% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 5500 | Radeon HD 8280E |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 5500 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8280E has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 5500 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro FX 5500 | Radeon HD 8280E |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 5500 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 8280E's 50W — a 116.3% difference. The Radeon HD 8280E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 5500) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8280E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro FX 5500 | Radeon HD 8280E |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 50W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.3 | 5.1+292% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 5500 launched at $2999 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon HD 8280E launched at $150 and now averages $110. The Quadro FX 5500 costs 72.7% less ($80 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.1 (Quadro FX 5500) vs 2.3 (Radeon HD 8280E) — the Quadro FX 5500 offers 252.2% better value. The Radeon HD 8280E is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 5500 | Radeon HD 8280E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2999 | $150-95% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-73% | $110 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.1+252% | 2.3 |
| Codename | GT200B | Venus |
| Release | November 11 2008 | April 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #815 | #745 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















