Quadro FX 5500 vs Radeon HD4650
Quadro FX 5500
Popular choices:
Radeon HD4650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 5500 is positioned at rank 418 and the Radeon HD4650 is on rank 236, so the Radeon HD4650 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 5500
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD4650
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 5500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD4650.
| Insight | Quadro FX 5500 | Radeon HD4650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD4650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD4650 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $30), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 98.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 5500 | Radeon HD4650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+98.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 5500 and Radeon HD4650
Quadro FX 5500
The Quadro FX 5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 242 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Radeon HD4650
The Radeon HD4650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 240 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 5500 scores 242 and the Radeon HD4650 reaches 240 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 5500 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD4650 uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 5500) vs 1,408 (Radeon HD4650). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 5500) vs 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD4650).
| Feature | Quadro FX 5500 | Radeon HD4650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 242 | 240 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 1408+487% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 2.253 TFLOPS+262% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 88+10% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 5500 | Radeon HD4650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 5500 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD4650 has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 5500 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 5500) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD4650) — the Radeon HD4650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 5500 | Radeon HD4650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 5500 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD4650's 200W — a 5.7% difference. The Quadro FX 5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 5500) vs 350W (Radeon HD4650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro FX 5500 | Radeon HD4650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W-6% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 193mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 5500 launched at $2999 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon HD4650 launched at $50 and now averages $15. The Radeon HD4650 costs 50% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.1 (Quadro FX 5500) vs 16.0 (Radeon HD4650) — the Radeon HD4650 offers 97.5% better value. The Radeon HD4650 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 5500 | Radeon HD4650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2999 | $50-98% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $15-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.1 | 16.0+98% |
| Codename | GT200B | Cayman |
| Release | November 11 2008 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #815 | #623 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 5500 and Radeon HD4650
