Quadro FX 5500 vs Radeon HD4650

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 5500

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD4650

2010Boost: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro FX 5500 vs Radeon HD4650 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 5500 vs Radeon HD4650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 5500 vs Radeon HD4650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 5500

2008

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD4650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 5898% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,999 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD4650

2010

Why buy it

  • 2.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $2,949 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 5848.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD4650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro FX 5500 instead at 242 vs 240, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX 5500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD4650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,949 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $2,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 5848.4% (4.8 vs 0.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD4650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 5500 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 5500 vs Radeon HD4650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 5500

The Quadro FX 5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 242 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon HD4650

The Radeon HD4650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 240 points. Launch price was $299.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 5500 scores 242 and the Radeon HD4650 reaches 240 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 5500 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD4650 uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 5500) vs 1,408 (Radeon HD4650). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 5500) vs 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD4650).

FeatureQuadro FX 5500Radeon HD4650
G3D Mark Score
242
240
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TeraScale 3
Process Node
55 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
240
1408+487%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
2.253 TFLOPS+262%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
88+10%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 5500Radeon HD4650
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 5500 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD4650 carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 5500 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 5500 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD4650. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 5500) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD4650) — the Radeon HD4650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 5500Radeon HD4650
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 5500 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD4650's 200W — a 5.7% difference. The Quadro FX 5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 5500) vs 350W (Radeon HD4650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro FX 5500Radeon HD4650
TDP
189W-6%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
193mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
1.3+8%
1.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 5500 came in at $2999, while the Radeon HD4650 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD4650 was 98.3% cheaper ($2949 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (Quadro FX 5500) vs 4.8 (Radeon HD4650) — the Radeon HD4650 offers 4700% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD4650 (2010 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 5500Radeon HD4650
MSRP
$2999
$50-98%
Performance per Dollar
0.1
4.8+4700%
Codename
GT200B
Cayman
Release
November 11 2008
December 14 2010
Ranking
#815
#623

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.