Quadro FX 5500 vs Radeon HD 8470

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 5500 vs Radeon HD 8470 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 5500 vs Radeon HD 8470: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 5500

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8470 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
5898% HIGHER MSRP
$2,999 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 8470

2012

Why buy it

✅22.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $2,949 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 6046.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 8470 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 22.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (248 vs 242), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 5500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 8470 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,949 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $2,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 6046.7% (5.0 vs 0.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8470 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 5500 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 5500 vs Radeon HD 8470 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 5500

The Quadro FX 5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 242 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 8470

The Radeon HD 8470 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 248 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 5500 scores 242 and the Radeon HD 8470 reaches 248 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 5500 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8470 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 5500) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8470). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 5500) vs 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8470).

Feature	Quadro FX 5500	Radeon HD 8470
G3D Mark Score	242	248+2%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	240	1280+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	2.56 TFLOPS+312%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	80
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 5500	Radeon HD 8470
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 5500 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8470. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 5500) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8470) — the Radeon HD 8470 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 5500	Radeon HD 8470
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 5500 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 8470's 200W — a 5.7% difference. The Quadro FX 5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 5500) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8470). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro FX 5500	Radeon HD 8470
TDP	189W-6%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt	1.3+8%	1.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 5500 came in at $2999, while the Radeon HD 8470 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8470 was 98.3% cheaper ($2949 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (Quadro FX 5500) vs 5.0 (Radeon HD 8470) — the Radeon HD 8470 offers 4900% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 8470 (2012 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 5500	Radeon HD 8470
MSRP	$2999	$50-98%
Performance per Dollar	0.1	5.0+4900%
Codename	GT200B	Pitcairn
Release	November 11 2008	March 5 2012
Ranking	#815	#460

Search Quadro FX 5500 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8470 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.