Quadro FX 560 vs GeForce 9300M GS
Quadro FX 560
Popular choices:
GeForce 9300M GS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 560 is positioned at rank 390 and the GeForce 9300M GS is on rank 686, so the Quadro FX 560 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 560
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9300M GS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 9300M GS is significantly newer (2015 vs 2008). The GeForce 9300M GS likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 560 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9300M GS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (256 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 560.
| Insight | Quadro FX 560 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9300M GS offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9300M GS holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $15), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 55.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 560 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+55.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 560 and GeForce 9300M GS
Quadro FX 560
The Quadro FX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $3,499.
GeForce 9300M GS
The GeForce 9300M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 118 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 560 scores 114 and the GeForce 9300M GS reaches 118 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 560 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce 9300M GS uses Maxwell, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 560) vs 384 (GeForce 9300M GS). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 560) vs 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300M GS).
| Feature | Quadro FX 560 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 114 | 118+4% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 384+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS+48% | 0.4216 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 80+233% | 24 |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 560 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 560 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9300M GS has 256 MB. The GeForce 9300M GS offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 560) vs 1 MB (GeForce 9300M GS) — the GeForce 9300M GS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 560 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.25 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9_0c (Quadro FX 560) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9300M GS). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | Quadro FX 560 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9_0c | 10.0+11% |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 560 draws 189W versus the GeForce 9300M GS's 33W — a 140.5% difference. The GeForce 9300M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 560) vs 350W (GeForce 9300M GS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro FX 560 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 33W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.6 | 3.6+500% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 560 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce 9300M GS launched at $100 and now averages $10. The GeForce 9300M GS costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.6 (Quadro FX 560) vs 11.8 (GeForce 9300M GS) — the GeForce 9300M GS offers 55.3% better value. The GeForce 9300M GS is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 560 | GeForce 9300M GS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $100-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $10-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.6 | 11.8+55% |
| Codename | GT200B | GM108 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #815 | #880 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 560 and GeForce 9300M GS
