Quadro FX 560 vs Radeon X1600 XT

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 560 vs Radeon X1600 XT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 560 vs Radeon X1600 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 560

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 189W instead of 300W, a 111W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
50.3% HIGHER MSRP
$299 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Radeon X1600 XT

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 52.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Quadro FX 560 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1600 XT is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌58.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 189W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon X1600 XT is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (116 vs 114), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon X1600 XT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 55nm, and 80 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon X1600 XT makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 52.9% (0.6 vs 0.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Quadro FX 560 vs Radeon X1600 XT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 560

The Quadro FX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon X1600 XT

The Radeon X1600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 116 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 560 scores 114 and the Radeon X1600 XT reaches 116 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 560 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon X1600 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 560) vs 5,120 (Radeon X1600 XT). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 560) vs 23.04 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600 XT).

Feature	Quadro FX 560	Radeon X1600 XT
G3D Mark Score	114	116+2%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	55 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	240	5120+2033%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	23.04 TFLOPS+3604%
ROPs	32	128+300%
TMUs	80	320+300%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	4 MB+1500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 560	Radeon X1600 XT
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 560 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1600 XT carries 512 MB. Radeon X1600 XT gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 560 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1600 XT. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 560) vs 4 MB (Radeon X1600 XT) — the Radeon X1600 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 560	Radeon X1600 XT
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	4 MB+1500%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 560 draws 189W versus the Radeon X1600 XT's 300W — a 45.4% difference. The Quadro FX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 560) vs 350W (Radeon X1600 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro FX 560	Radeon X1600 XT
TDP	189W-37%	300W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	—
Slots	1	—
Perf/Watt	0.6+50%	0.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 560 came in at $299, while the Radeon X1600 XT launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon X1600 XT was 33.4% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (Quadro FX 560) vs 0.6 (Radeon X1600 XT) — the Radeon X1600 XT offers 50% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1600 XT (2020 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 560	Radeon X1600 XT
MSRP	$299	$199-33%
Performance per Dollar	0.4	0.6+50%
Codename	GT200B	Navi 21
Release	November 11 2008	October 28 2020
Ranking	#815	#35

Search Quadro FX 560 on Amazon

Search Radeon X1600 XT on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.