Quadro FX 560 vs Radeon HD 2400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 560 vs Radeon HD 2400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 560 vs Radeon HD 2400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 560

2008

Why buy it

✅4.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
278.5% HIGHER MSRP
$299 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).

Radeon HD 2400

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 301.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 560 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 560 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 2400 instead at 121 vs 114, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 560 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 2400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $220 cheaper on MSRP at $79 vs $299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 301.7% (1.5 vs 0.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 2400 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 560 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 560 vs Radeon HD 2400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 560

The Quadro FX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 2400

The Radeon HD 2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 121 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 560 scores 114 versus the Radeon HD 2400's 121 — the Radeon HD 2400 leads by 6.1%. The Quadro FX 560 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 2400 uses TeraScale, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 560) vs 800 (Radeon HD 2400). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 560) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2400).

Feature	Quadro FX 560	Radeon HD 2400
G3D Mark Score	114	121+6%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	TeraScale
Process Node	55 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	240	800+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	1.36 TFLOPS+119%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+100%	40
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 560	Radeon HD 2400
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 560 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 2400 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 2400 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 560 and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 2400.

Feature	Quadro FX 560	Radeon HD 2400
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 560 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 2400's 190W — a 0.5% difference. The Quadro FX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 560) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro FX 560	Radeon HD 2400
TDP	189W	190W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	1mm	—
Slots	1	—
Perf/Watt	0.6	0.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 560 came in at $299, while the Radeon HD 2400 launched at $79. On MSRP, Radeon HD 2400 was 73.6% cheaper ($220 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (Quadro FX 560) vs 1.5 (Radeon HD 2400) — the Radeon HD 2400 offers 275% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 2400 (2009 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 560	Radeon HD 2400
MSRP	$299	$79-74%
Performance per Dollar	0.4	1.5+275%
Codename	GT200B	RV790
Release	November 11 2008	April 2 2009
Ranking	#815	#762

Search Quadro FX 560 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 2400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.