
Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

Quadro FX 560
Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi vs Quadro FX 560 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi vs Quadro FX 560 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi vs Quadro FX 560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 494.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 189W, a 159W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro FX 560
2008Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌510.2% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌530% higher power demand at 189W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi vs Quadro FX 560 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 111 points.

Quadro FX 560
The Quadro FX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi scores 111 and the Quadro FX 560 reaches 114 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is built on TeraScale while the Quadro FX 560 uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi) vs 240 (Quadro FX 560). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 560).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi | Quadro FX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 111 | 114+3% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+233% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS+41% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi | Quadro FX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 560 carries 128 MB. Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 560.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi | Quadro FX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi) vs 9_0c (Quadro FX 560). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi | Quadro FX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1+12% | 9_0c |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi draws 30W versus the Quadro FX 560's 189W — a 145.2% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi) vs 350W (Quadro FX 560). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi | Quadro FX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-84% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.7+517% | 0.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi came in at $49, while the Quadro FX 560 launched at $299. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi was 83.6% cheaper ($250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.3 (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi) vs 0.4 (Quadro FX 560) — the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi offers 475% better value. The newer card here is Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi (2009 vs 2008).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi | Quadro FX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-84% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.3+475% | 0.4 |
| Codename | M98 | GT200B |
| Release | January 9 2009 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #927 | #815 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














