Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi vs Quadro FX 560

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is positioned at rank 626 and the Quadro FX 560 is on rank 390, so the Quadro FX 560 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

#616

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

4783%

#618

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

4336%

#619

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

4324%

#623

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

3932%

#624

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

3905%

#626

Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

100%

#627

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 8470 Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

99%

#628

GeForce 9500M GS

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

98%

#629

GeForce 8800 GS

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

97%

#631

GeForce 9800 GTX+

MSRP: $229|Avg: $50

94%

#632

Mobility Radeon X1700

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

94%

#633

Mobility Radeon HD 560v

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

93%

#634

GeForce 9300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $20

93%

#635

Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU

MSRP: $899|Avg: $400

93%

#636

GeForce 8400M G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $20

93%

#637

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

92%

#638

GeForce 8400M GS

MSRP: $50|Avg: $20

92%

#639

GeForce 9100

MSRP: $40|Avg: $5

90%

#640

GeForce 8300

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

90%

#641

GeForce 9600M GT

MSRP: $80|Avg: $20

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 560

#374

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

38876%

#389

GRID V100-2Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $2000

100%

#390

Quadro FX 560

MSRP: $299|Avg: $15

100%

#391

Quadro FX 5800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $40

92%

#392

FireStream 9170

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $20

84%

#393

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565

84%

#394

Quadro FX 1700

MSRP: $699|Avg: $500

82%

#395

GRID P40-6Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

79%

#396

Quadro FX 540

MSRP: $299|Avg: $15

71%

#397

Tesla M2070-Q

MSRP: $5489|Avg: $50

63%

#398

Quadro FX 1500

MSRP: $699|Avg: $30

63%

#399

Quadro 7000

MSRP: $14499|Avg: $300

63%

#400

Quadro FX 3700

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $500

61%

#401

Quadro FX 4700 X2

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $15

61%

#402

GRID M10-0B

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000

58%

#404

GRID K340

MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57

53%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 560 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi	Quadro FX 560
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+300%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $15), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 46.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi	Quadro FX 560
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+46.1%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($10)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 560 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi and Quadro FX 560

Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 111 points.

Quadro FX 560

The Quadro FX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi scores 111 and the Quadro FX 560 reaches 114 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is built on TeraScale while the Quadro FX 560 uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi) vs 240 (Quadro FX 560). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 560).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi	Quadro FX 560
G3D Mark Score	111	114+3%
Architecture	TeraScale	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	55 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	800+233%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.88 TFLOPS+41%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	80+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi	Quadro FX 560
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 560 has 128 MB. The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi	Quadro FX 560
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+300%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi) vs 9_0c (Quadro FX 560). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi	Quadro FX 560
DirectX	10.1+12%	9_0c
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi draws 30W versus the Quadro FX 560's 189W — a 145.2% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi) vs 350W (Quadro FX 560). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi	Quadro FX 560
TDP	30W-84%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	3.7+517%	0.6

💰

Value Analysis

The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Quadro FX 560 launched at $299 and now averages $15. The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi) vs 7.6 (Quadro FX 560) — the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi offers 46.1% better value. The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is the newer GPU (2009 vs 2008).