Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi vs Radeon HD 7290

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi vs Radeon HD 7290 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi vs Radeon HD 7290: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 375W, a 345W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
145% HIGHER MSRP
$49 MSRPvs$20 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $20 MSRP).

Radeon HD 7290

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($20 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
✅Delivers 147.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.6 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($20 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌1150% higher power demand at 375W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 7290 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (112 vs 111), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 7290 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $29 cheaper on MSRP at $20 vs $49, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 147.2% (5.6 vs 2.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 7290 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi has the stronger long-term case.

Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi vs Radeon HD 7290 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 111 points.

Radeon HD 7290

The Radeon HD 7290 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 950 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 112 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi scores 111 and the Radeon HD 7290 reaches 112 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is built on TeraScale while the Radeon HD 7290 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 7290). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi) vs 4.096 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 7290).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi	Radeon HD 7290
G3D Mark Score	111	112
Architecture	TeraScale	GCN 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	800	2048 ×2+156%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.88 TFLOPS	4.096 TFLOPS ×2+365%
ROPs	16	32 ×2+100%
TMUs	40	128 ×2+220%
L1 Cache	160 KB	512 KB+220%
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi	Radeon HD 7290
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7290. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 7290) — the Radeon HD 7290 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi	Radeon HD 7290
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 7290's 375W — a 170.4% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7290). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi	Radeon HD 7290
TDP	30W-92%	375W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	3.7+1133%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi came in at $49, while the Radeon HD 7290 launched at $20. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7290 was 59.2% cheaper ($29 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.3 (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi) vs 5.6 (Radeon HD 7290) — the Radeon HD 7290 offers 143.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 7290 (2013 vs 2009).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi	Radeon HD 7290
MSRP	$49	$20-59%
Performance per Dollar	2.3	5.6+143%
Codename	M98	Malta
Release	January 9 2009	April 24 2013
Ranking	#927	#412

Search Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 7290 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.