GeForce 315M
VS
Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

GeForce 315M vs Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

NVIDIA

GeForce 315M

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 1020 MHz
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

2009Core: 550 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 315M is positioned at rank 535 and the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is on rank 626, so the GeForce 315M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 315M

#525
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2835%
#527
2570%
#528
2563%
#532
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
2331%
#533
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
2315%
#535
GeForce 315M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#536
100%
#538
99%
#539
Radeon R7 M445
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
99%
#540
Mobility Radeon HD 540v
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
98%
#541
98%
#542
97%
#543
Radeon R9 M275
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#544
Radeon HD 7640G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#545
Mobility Radeon HD 5430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
96%
#546
96%
#547
96%
#548
Radeon R5 M335
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
96%
#549
95%
#550
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

#616
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
4783%
#618
4336%
#619
4324%
#623
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
3932%
#624
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
3905%
#626
100%
#627
99%
#628
GeForce 9500M GS
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
98%
#629
GeForce 8800 GS
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
97%
#631
GeForce 9800 GTX+
MSRP: $229|Avg: $50
94%
#632
Mobility Radeon X1700
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
94%
#633
Mobility Radeon HD 560v
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
93%
#634
GeForce 9300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
93%
#635
Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
MSRP: $899|Avg: $400
93%
#636
GeForce 8400M G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
93%
#637
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
92%
#638
GeForce 8400M GS
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
92%
#639
GeForce 9100
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
90%
#640
GeForce 8300
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
90%
#641
GeForce 9600M GT
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce 315M is significantly newer (2015 vs 2009). The GeForce 315M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 315M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi.

InsightGeForce 315MMobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
Performance
Leading raw performance (+3.6%)
Lower raw frame rates (-3.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 315M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 315M and Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

NVIDIA

GeForce 315M

The GeForce 315M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 115 points.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 111 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 315M scores 115 and the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi reaches 111 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 315M is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 315M) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 315M) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi).

FeatureGeForce 315MMobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
G3D Mark Score
115+4%
111
Architecture
Maxwell
TeraScale
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
640
800+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.306 TFLOPS+48%
0.88 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40
40
L1 Cache
320 KB+100%
160 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 315MMobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 315M) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi) — the GeForce 315M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 315MMobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 315M) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 315MMobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
DirectX
10.1
10.1
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 315M) vs UVD (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs UVD.

FeatureGeForce 315MMobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
Encoder
None
UVD
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
UVD
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 315M draws 75W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 315M) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce 315MMobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
TDP
75W
30W-60%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
1.5
3.7+147%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 315M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2009).

FeatureGeForce 315MMobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi
MSRP
$49
Avg Price (30d)
$10
Codename
GM107
M98
Release
October 27 2015
January 9 2009
Ranking
#671
#927