GeForce 9300M GS vs Quadro FX 560

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9300M GS vs Quadro FX 560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9300M GS vs Quadro FX 560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9300M GS

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 209.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.2 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Draws 33W instead of 189W, a 156W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 560 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 560

2008

Why buy it

✅3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
199% HIGHER MSRP
$299 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌472.7% higher power demand at 189W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 560 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 9300M GS instead at 118 vs 114, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 9300M GS is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 256 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 9300M GS makes the most sense to buy today. It is $199 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 209.5% (1.2 vs 0.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro FX 560 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 9300M GS vs Quadro FX 560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9300M GS

The GeForce 9300M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 118 points.

Quadro FX 560

The Quadro FX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9300M GS scores 118 and the Quadro FX 560 reaches 114 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9300M GS is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 560 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 240 (Quadro FX 560). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 560).

Feature	GeForce 9300M GS	Quadro FX 560
G3D Mark Score	118+4%	114
Architecture	Maxwell	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384+60%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4216 TFLOPS	0.6221 TFLOPS+48%
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	80+233%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9300M GS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 560 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 9300M GS	Quadro FX 560
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9300M GS has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 560 carries 128 MB. GeForce 9300M GS gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9300M GS and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 560. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 560) — the GeForce 9300M GS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 9300M GS	Quadro FX 560
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB+100%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 9_0c (Quadro FX 560). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 9300M GS	Quadro FX 560
DirectX	10.0+11%	9_0c
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9300M GS draws 33W versus the Quadro FX 560's 189W — a 140.5% difference. The GeForce 9300M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 350W (Quadro FX 560). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce 9300M GS	Quadro FX 560
TDP	33W-83%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	1mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	3.6+500%	0.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9300M GS came in at $100, while the Quadro FX 560 launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce 9300M GS was 66.6% cheaper ($199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 0.4 (Quadro FX 560) — the GeForce 9300M GS offers 200% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9300M GS (2015 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 9300M GS	Quadro FX 560
MSRP	$100-67%	$299
Performance per Dollar	1.2+200%	0.4
Codename	GM108	GT200B
Release	March 13 2015	November 11 2008
Ranking	#880	#815

Search GeForce 9300M GS on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 560 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.