Quadro FX 560 vs Radeon HD 7290

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 560 vs Radeon HD 7290 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 560 vs Radeon HD 7290: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 560

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 189W instead of 375W, a 186W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1395% HIGHER MSRP
$299 MSRPvs$20 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $20 MSRP).

Radeon HD 7290

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $279 less on MSRP ($20 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1368.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.6 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($20 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌98.4% higher power demand at 375W vs 189W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 560 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (114 vs 112), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 560 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 7290 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $279 cheaper on MSRP at $20 vs $299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1368.8% (5.6 vs 0.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 7290 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 560 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 560 vs Radeon HD 7290 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 560

The Quadro FX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 7290

The Radeon HD 7290 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 950 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 112 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 560 scores 114 and the Radeon HD 7290 reaches 112 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 560 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 7290 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 560) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 7290). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 560) vs 4.096 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 7290).

Feature	Quadro FX 560	Radeon HD 7290
G3D Mark Score	114+2%	112
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	240	2048 ×2+753%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	4.096 TFLOPS ×2+558%
ROPs	32	32 ×2
TMUs	80	128 ×2+60%
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 560	Radeon HD 7290
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 560 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7290 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 7290 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 560 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7290. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 560) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 7290) — the Radeon HD 7290 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 560	Radeon HD 7290
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 560 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 7290's 375W — a 66% difference. The Quadro FX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 560) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7290). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro FX 560	Radeon HD 7290
TDP	189W-50%	375W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	1mm	—
Slots	1	—
Perf/Watt	0.6+100%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 560 came in at $299, while the Radeon HD 7290 launched at $20. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7290 was 93.3% cheaper ($279 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (Quadro FX 560) vs 5.6 (Radeon HD 7290) — the Radeon HD 7290 offers 1300% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 7290 (2013 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 560	Radeon HD 7290
MSRP	$299	$20-93%
Performance per Dollar	0.4	5.6+1300%
Codename	GT200B	Malta
Release	November 11 2008	April 24 2013
Ranking	#815	#412

Search Quadro FX 560 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 7290 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.