Quadro FX 5600 vs GeForce 9800M GS
Quadro FX 5600
Popular choices:
GeForce 9800M GS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 5600 is positioned at rank 407 and the GeForce 9800M GS is on rank 608, so the Quadro FX 5600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 5600
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9800M GS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 5600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9800M GS.
| Insight | Quadro FX 5600 | GeForce 9800M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro FX 5600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 5600 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $50), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 5600 | GeForce 9800M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 5600 and GeForce 9800M GS
Quadro FX 5600
The Quadro FX 5600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $3,499.
GeForce 9800M GS
The GeForce 9800M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 517 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 5600 scores 525 and the GeForce 9800M GS reaches 517 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 5600 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce 9800M GS uses G9x, both on 55 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 5600) vs 224 (GeForce 9800M GS).
| Feature | Quadro FX 5600 | GeForce 9800M GS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 525+2% | 517 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | G9x |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 240+7% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 5600 | GeForce 9800M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 5600 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9800M GS has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 5600 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro FX 5600 | GeForce 9800M GS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 5600 draws 189W versus the GeForce 9800M GS's 150W — a 23% difference. The GeForce 9800M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 5600) vs 350W (GeForce 9800M GS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Quadro FX 5600 | GeForce 9800M GS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 150W-21% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.8 | 3.4+21% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 5600 launched at $2999 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce 9800M GS launched at $200 and now averages $50. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.5 (Quadro FX 5600) vs 10.3 (GeForce 9800M GS) — the Quadro FX 5600 offers 1.9% better value.
| Feature | Quadro FX 5600 | GeForce 9800M GS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2999 | $200-93% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.5+2% | 10.3 |
| Codename | GT200B | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | November 11 2008 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #815 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 5600 and GeForce 9800M GS
