Quadro FX 5600
VS
GRID K180Q

Quadro FX 5600 vs GRID K180Q

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 5600

2008Core: 610 MHz
VS

GRID K180Q

2013Core: 745 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 5600 is positioned at rank 407 and the GRID K180Q is on rank 381, so the GRID K180Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 5600

#392
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
82072%
#407
Quadro FX 5600
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50
100%
#408
Quadro FX 3500
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
94%
#410
GRID K1
MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120
89%
#411
Quadro FX 1400
MSRP: $799|Avg: $30
89%
#413
GRID P4-1Q
MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185
67%
#416
GRID RTX6000-2Q
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500
56%
#417
GRID M60-0B
MSRP: $19900|Avg: $19900
50%
#418
Quadro FX 4500 X2
MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799
44%
#419
Quadro FX 5500
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30
44%
#420
Quadro FX 1000
MSRP: $500|Avg: $30
39%
#421
Quadro FX 1300
MSRP: $599|Avg: $15
33%
#422
Quadro FX 3400/4400
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $50
33%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID K180Q

#366
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
27874%
#381
GRID K180Q
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $1000
100%
#382
GRID K2
MSRP: $5199|Avg: $80
100%
#383
Quadro CX
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $500
89%
#384
GRID P100-8Q
MSRP: $7374|Avg: $550
83%
#385
Quadro FX 550
MSRP: $150|Avg: $10
81%
#386
Quadro FX 350
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
81%
#387
Tesla M2070
MSRP: $3099|Avg: $50
79%
#388
GRID V100D-8Q
MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000
79%
#389
GRID M10-0Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
75%
#390
GRID V100-2Q
MSRP: $10000|Avg: $2000
72%
#391
Quadro FX 560
MSRP: $299|Avg: $15
72%
#392
Quadro FX 5800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $40
66%
#393
FireStream 9170
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $20
60%
#394
RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565
60%
#395
Quadro FX 1700
MSRP: $699|Avg: $500
58%
#396
GRID P40-6Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
57%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID K180Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 5600 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightQuadro FX 5600GRID K180Q
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro FX 5600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 5600 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $1,000), it costs 95% less, resulting in a 1866.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro FX 5600GRID K180Q
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+1866.3%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($50)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,000)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 5600 and GRID K180Q

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 5600

The Quadro FX 5600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $3,499.

NVIDIA

GRID K180Q

The GRID K180Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 534 points. Launch price was $1,875.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 5600 scores 525 and the GRID K180Q reaches 534 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 5600 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GRID K180Q uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 5600) vs 1,536 (GRID K180Q). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 5600) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K180Q).

FeatureQuadro FX 5600GRID K180Q
G3D Mark Score
525
534+2%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Kepler
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
240
1536+540%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS+268%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
128+60%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 5600GRID K180Q
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 5600 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K180Q has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 5600 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 5600) vs 512 KB (GRID K180Q) — the GRID K180Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 5600GRID K180Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 5600 draws 189W versus the GRID K180Q's 225W — a 17.4% difference. The Quadro FX 5600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 5600) vs 350W (GRID K180Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro FX 5600GRID K180Q
TDP
189W-16%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
2.8+17%
2.4
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro FX 5600 launched at $2999 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GRID K180Q launched at $1000 and now averages $1000. The Quadro FX 5600 costs 95% less ($950 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.5 (Quadro FX 5600) vs 0.5 (GRID K180Q) — the Quadro FX 5600 offers 2000% better value. The GRID K180Q is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 5600GRID K180Q
MSRP
$2999
$1000-67%
Avg Price (30d)
$50-95%
$1000
Performance per Dollar
10.5+2000%
0.5
Codename
GT200B
GK104
Release
November 11 2008
June 28 2013
Ranking
#815
#595