
Quadro FX 580 vs FirePro 3D V3700

Quadro FX 580
Popular choices:

FirePro 3D V3700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 580 is positioned at rank 355 and the FirePro 3D V3700 is on rank 303, so the FirePro 3D V3700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 580
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V3700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The FirePro 3D V3700 is significantly newer (2014 vs 2008). The FirePro 3D V3700 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 580 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 580 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 3D V3700.
| Insight | Quadro FX 580 | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V3700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro 3D V3700 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $500), it costs 98% less, resulting in a 4844.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 580 | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+4844.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 580 and FirePro 3D V3700

Quadro FX 580
The Quadro FX 580 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 181 points. Launch price was $3,499.

FirePro 3D V3700
The FirePro 3D V3700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 179 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 580 scores 181 and the FirePro 3D V3700 reaches 179 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 580 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the FirePro 3D V3700 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 580) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V3700). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 580) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V3700).
| Feature | Quadro FX 580 | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 181+1% | 179 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 2048+753% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 3.482 TFLOPS+460% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 580 | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 580 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V3700 has 256 MB. The Quadro FX 580 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 580) vs 768 KB (FirePro 3D V3700) — the FirePro 3D V3700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 580 | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 580 draws 189W versus the FirePro 3D V3700's 274W — a 36.7% difference. The Quadro FX 580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 580) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V3700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro FX 580 | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W-31% | 274W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.0+43% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 580 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the FirePro 3D V3700 launched at $99 and now averages $10. The FirePro 3D V3700 costs 98% less ($490 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.4 (Quadro FX 580) vs 17.9 (FirePro 3D V3700) — the FirePro 3D V3700 offers 4375% better value. The FirePro 3D V3700 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 580 | FirePro 3D V3700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $99-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $10-98% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.4 | 17.9+4375% |
| Codename | GT200B | Tahiti |
| Release | November 11 2008 | January 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #815 | #423 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















