Quadro FX 580
VS
GeForce GT 120

Quadro FX 580 vs GeForce GT 120

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 580

2008Core: 610 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 120

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 580 is positioned at rank 355 and the GeForce GT 120 is on rank 317, so the GeForce GT 120 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 580

#340
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
16234%
#355
Quadro FX 580
MSRP: $199|Avg: $500
100%
#356
FirePro 3D V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $25
100%
#358
GRID M60-1B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
99%
#359
FireStream 9270
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $20
98%
#360
Quadro 400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $500
97%
#361
FirePro 2260
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
97%
#362
Quadro FX 380 LP
MSRP: $169|Avg: $15
95%
#364
Quadro FX 1800
MSRP: $489|Avg: $100
89%
#365
FirePro 3D V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1229
88%
#366
FirePro 3D V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $80
88%
#367
Quadro 5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $100
87%
#368
FirePro V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $20
86%
#369
FirePro V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250
86%
#370
FirePro 3D V8750
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $500
78%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 120

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
3859%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
3707%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
3664%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
3657%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
3650%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
3629%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
3584%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
3570%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
3537%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
3528%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
3485%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
3478%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
3415%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
3413%
#301
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
4255%
#316
Radeon HD 6250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
100%
#317
GeForce GT 120
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
100%
#318
GeForce 6600 LE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
90%
#319
Radeon HD 3670
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
90%
#320
Radeon HD 3200
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
87%
#321
Radeon HD 2350
MSRP: $50|Avg: $48
82%
#322
Radeon HD 2400
MSRP: $79|Avg: $10
81%
#323
Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP: $79|Avg: $10
80%
#325
GeForce 7300 GT
MSRP: $89|Avg: $20
74%
#326
Radeon HD 3870 X2
MSRP: $449|Avg: $40
70%
#328
GeForce 7950 GT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $50
62%
#329
RADEON X550XT
MSRP: $50|Avg: $40
60%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GT 120 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2008). The GeForce GT 120 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 580 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 120 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 580.

InsightQuadro FX 580GeForce GT 120
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3.9%)
Leading raw performance (+3.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GT 120 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 120 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $500), it costs 92% less, resulting in a 1198.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro FX 580GeForce GT 120
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1198.3%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)
More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 580 and GeForce GT 120

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 580

The Quadro FX 580 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 181 points. Launch price was $3,499.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 120

The GeForce GT 120 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 188 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 580 scores 181 and the GeForce GT 120 reaches 188 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 580 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce GT 120 uses Pascal, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 580) vs 384 (GeForce GT 120). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 580) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 120).

FeatureQuadro FX 580GeForce GT 120
G3D Mark Score
181
188+4%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Pascal
Process Node
55 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
240
384+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
1.127 TFLOPS+81%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
80+233%
24
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 580GeForce GT 120
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 580) vs 512 KB (GeForce GT 120) — the GeForce GT 120 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 580GeForce GT 120
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 580 draws 189W versus the GeForce GT 120's 30W — a 145.2% difference. The GeForce GT 120 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 580) vs 350W (GeForce GT 120). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro FX 580GeForce GT 120
TDP
189W
30W-84%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
1.0
6.3+530%
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro FX 580 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GeForce GT 120 launched at $100 and now averages $40. The GeForce GT 120 costs 92% less ($460 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.4 (Quadro FX 580) vs 4.7 (GeForce GT 120) — the GeForce GT 120 offers 1075% better value. The GeForce GT 120 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 580GeForce GT 120
MSRP
$199
$100-50%
Avg Price (30d)
$500
$40-92%
Performance per Dollar
0.4
4.7+1075%
Codename
GT200B
GP108
Release
November 11 2008
May 17 2017
Ranking
#815
#641