
Quadro GV100 vs GeForce GTX 1650

Quadro GV100
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro GV100
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro GV100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 141.6% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (32 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.
| Insight | Quadro GV100 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+141.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-141.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Volta (2017−2020)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $8,999 for the Quadro GV100, it costs 99% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 4865.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro GV100 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+4865.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($8,999) | ✅More affordable ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro GV100 and GeForce GTX 1650

Quadro GV100
The Quadro GV100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 27 2018. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1132 MHz to 1627 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,013 points. Launch price was $8,999.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro GV100 scores 19,013 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the Quadro GV100 leads by 141.6%. The Quadro GV100 is built on Volta while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 5,120 (Quadro GV100) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 16.66 TFLOPS (Quadro GV100) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1627 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro GV100 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,013+142% | 7,869 |
| Architecture | Volta | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120+471% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.66 TFLOPS+458% | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1627 MHz | 1665 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 128+300% | 32 |
| TMUs | 320+471% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 10 MB+1036% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro GV100 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro GV100 comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The Quadro GV100 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1024 GB/s (Quadro GV100) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 700% advantage for the Quadro GV100. Bus width: 4096-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro GV100) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Quadro GV100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro GV100 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+700% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1024 GB/s+700% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+3100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro GV100) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro GV100 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro GV100) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Quadro GV100) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | Quadro GV100 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro GV100 draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro GV100) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Quadro GV100 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 75W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 300W-54% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 267mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 76.1 | 104.9+38% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro GV100 launched at $8999 MSRP and currently averages $8999, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 99.2% less ($8924 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.1 (Quadro GV100) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 4895.2% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro GV100 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $8999 | $149-98% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $8999 | $75-99% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.1 | 104.9+4895% |
| Codename | GV100 | TU117 |
| Release | March 27 2018 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #89 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.










