Quadro K2000D
VS
FirePro M4000

Quadro K2000D vs FirePro M4000

NVIDIA

Quadro K2000D

2013Core: 954 MHz
VS

FirePro M4000

2012Core: 675 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro K2000D is positioned at rank #257 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2000D

#106
L40S
MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500
100%
#107
Quadro P6000
MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500
97%
#241
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
5533%
#257
Quadro K2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
100%
#258
FirePro V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $96
100%
#259
FirePro W8000
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
100%
#260
GRID P4-8Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200
99%
#261
Quadro K2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
99%
#263
FirePro 3D V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $30
96%
#264
GRID M3-3020
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50
94%
#265
GRID P40-8Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
94%
#266
GRID M40
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
94%
#267
FirePro V3800
MSRP: $129|Avg: $12
93%
#268
FirePro V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $15
93%
#269
FirePro 3D V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $40
92%
#270
FirePro S9050
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825
92%
#271
FirePro R5000
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro K2000D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro M4000.

InsightQuadro K2000DFirePro M4000
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro M4000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro M4000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $35), it costs 14% less, resulting in a 16.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro K2000DFirePro M4000
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+16.4%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($35)
More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K2000D and FirePro M4000

NVIDIA

Quadro K2000D

The Quadro K2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,600 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

FirePro M4000

The FirePro M4000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,596 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K2000D scores 1,600 and the FirePro M4000 reaches 1,596 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2000D is built on Kepler while the FirePro M4000 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K2000D) vs 512 (FirePro M4000). Raw compute: 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000D) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4000).

FeatureQuadro K2000DFirePro M4000
G3D Mark Score
1,600
1,596
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7327 TFLOPS+6%
0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
32 KB
128 KB+300%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K2000DFirePro M4000
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureQuadro K2000DFirePro M4000
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2000D) vs 12 (FirePro M4000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

FeatureQuadro K2000DFirePro M4000
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
6+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (Quadro K2000D) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4000). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro K2000D) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (FirePro M4000).

FeatureQuadro K2000DFirePro M4000
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
VCE 1.0
Decoder
NVDEC 1st Gen
UVD 4.0
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K2000D draws 51W versus the FirePro M4000's 33W — a 42.9% difference. The FirePro M4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2000D) vs 350W (FirePro M4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 202mm vs 82mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.

FeatureQuadro K2000DFirePro M4000
TDP
51W
33W-35%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
202mm
82mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
80
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
31.4
48.4+54%
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro K2000D launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the FirePro M4000 launched at $0 and now averages $30. The FirePro M4000 costs 14.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 45.7 (Quadro K2000D) vs 53.2 (FirePro M4000) — the FirePro M4000 offers 16.4% better value. The Quadro K2000D is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).

FeatureQuadro K2000DFirePro M4000
MSRP
$599
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$35
$30-14%
Performance per Dollar
45.7
53.2+16%
Codename
GK107
Chelsea
Release
March 1 2013
June 27 2012
Ranking
#750
#752