Quadro K2000D vs Radeon RX Vega 10

NVIDIA

Quadro K2000D

2013Core: 954 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX Vega 10

2019Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1301 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro K2000D vs Radeon RX Vega 10 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K2000D vs Radeon RX Vega 10 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K2000D vs Radeon RX Vega 10: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K2000D

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Radeon RX Vega 10 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro K2000D is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 10 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 410% higher power demand at 51W vs 10W.

Radeon RX Vega 10

2019

Why buy it

  • 68.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 10W instead of 51W, a 41W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX Vega 10 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 68.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (1,629 vs 1,600), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro K2000D is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K2000D makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon RX Vega 10 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro K2000D vs Radeon RX Vega 10 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro K2000D

The Quadro K2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,600 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Radeon RX Vega 10

The Radeon RX Vega 10 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 8 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1301 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,629 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K2000D scores 1,600 and the Radeon RX Vega 10 reaches 1,629 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2000D is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX Vega 10 uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K2000D) vs 640 (Radeon RX Vega 10). Raw compute: 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000D) vs 1.665 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 10).

FeatureQuadro K2000DRadeon RX Vega 10
G3D Mark Score
1,600
1,629+2%
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 5.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384
640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7327 TFLOPS
1.665 TFLOPS+127%
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32
40+25%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K2000DRadeon RX Vega 10
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K2000D has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 10 carries 0 MB. Quadro K2000D gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K2000D and System on the Radeon RX Vega 10.

FeatureQuadro K2000DRadeon RX Vega 10
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2000D) vs 12 (Radeon RX Vega 10). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureQuadro K2000DRadeon RX Vega 10
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (Quadro K2000D) vs VCN 1.0 (Radeon RX Vega 10). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs VCN 1.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro K2000D) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 10).

FeatureQuadro K2000DRadeon RX Vega 10
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
VCN 1.0
Decoder
NVDEC 1st Gen
VCN 1.0
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K2000D draws 51W versus the Radeon RX Vega 10's 10W — a 134.4% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 10 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2000D) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 10). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 85°C.

FeatureQuadro K2000DRadeon RX Vega 10
TDP
51W
10W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
202mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
80-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
31.4
162.9+419%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K2000D came in at $599, while the Radeon RX Vega 10 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon RX Vega 10 was 100+% cheaper ($599 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (Quadro K2000D) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 10) — the Radeon RX Vega 10 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega 10 (2019 vs 2013).

FeatureQuadro K2000DRadeon RX Vega 10
MSRP
$599
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
2.7
Infinity
Codename
GK107
Raven
Release
March 1 2013
January 8 2019
Ranking
#750
#747

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.