G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 555 vs Quadro K2000D FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 555 vs Quadro K2000D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 555

2011

Why buy it

✅15.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $449 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 300.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.7 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌37.3% higher power demand at 70W vs 51W.

Quadro K2000D

2013

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Draws 51W instead of 70W, a 19W reduction.
✅Measures 202mm instead of 210mm, a 8mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 555 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
299.3% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 10.7 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 555 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (1,604 vs 1,600), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 555 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 555 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $449 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 300.3% (10.7 vs 2.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 555 vs Quadro K2000D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 555

The GeForce GTX 555 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,604 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro K2000D

The Quadro K2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,600 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 555 scores 1,604 and the Quadro K2000D reaches 1,600 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 555 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Quadro K2000D uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 144 (GeForce GTX 555) vs 384 (Quadro K2000D). Raw compute: 0.4147 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 555) vs 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000D).

Feature	GeForce GTX 555	Quadro K2000D
G3D Mark Score	1,604	1,600
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	144	384+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4147 TFLOPS	0.7327 TFLOPS+77%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	24	32+33%
L1 Cache	192 KB+500%	32 KB
L2 Cache	384 KB+50%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 555 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K2000D leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 555	Quadro K2000D
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 555 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2000D carries 2 GB. Quadro K2000D gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 555 and 64-bit on the Quadro K2000D. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 555) vs 256 KB (Quadro K2000D) — the GeForce GTX 555 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 555	Quadro K2000D
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	2 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	384 KB+50%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 555) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2000D). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 555	Quadro K2000D
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 555) vs NVENC 1st Gen (Quadro K2000D). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 555) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro K2000D).

Feature	GeForce GTX 555	Quadro K2000D
Encoder	PureVideo HD VP4	NVENC 1st Gen
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	NVDEC 1st Gen
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 555 draws 70W versus the Quadro K2000D's 51W — a 31.4% difference. The Quadro K2000D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 555) vs 350W (Quadro K2000D). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 210mm vs 202mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.

Feature	GeForce GTX 555	Quadro K2000D
TDP	70W	51W-27%
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	210mm	202mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80
Perf/Watt	22.9	31.4+37%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 555 came in at $150, while the Quadro K2000D launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 555 was 75% cheaper ($449 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.7 (GeForce GTX 555) vs 2.7 (Quadro K2000D) — the GeForce GTX 555 offers 296.3% better value. The newer card here is Quadro K2000D (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 555	Quadro K2000D
MSRP	$150-75%	$599
Performance per Dollar	10.7+296%	2.7
Codename	GF116	GK107
Release	May 14 2011	March 1 2013
Ranking	#849	#750

Search GeForce GTX 555 on Amazon

Search Quadro K2000D on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.