
GeForce GTX 555 vs GRID M10-2B

GeForce GTX 555
Popular choices:

GRID M10-2B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-2B
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M10-2B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 555 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 555 | GRID M10-2B |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 555 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 555 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $80), it costs 63% less, resulting in a 160.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 555 | GRID M10-2B |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+160.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 555 and GRID M10-2B

GeForce GTX 555
The GeForce GTX 555 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,604 points. Launch price was $149.

GRID M10-2B
The GRID M10-2B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,644 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 555 scores 1,604 and the GRID M10-2B reaches 1,644 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 555 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GRID M10-2B uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 144 (GeForce GTX 555) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-2B). Raw compute: 0.4147 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 555) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2B).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | GRID M10-2B |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,604 | 1,644+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 144 | 2048+1322% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4147 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+1063% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 128+433% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 768 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 2 MB+426% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | GRID M10-2B |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 555 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-2B has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 555 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 555) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-2B) — the GRID M10-2B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | GRID M10-2B |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 2 MB+426% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 555 draws 70W versus the GRID M10-2B's 225W — a 105.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 555 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 555) vs 350W (GRID M10-2B). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | GRID M10-2B |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-69% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 210mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 22.9+214% | 7.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 555 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GRID M10-2B launched at $2500 and now averages $80. The GeForce GTX 555 costs 62.5% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.5 (GeForce GTX 555) vs 20.6 (GRID M10-2B) — the GeForce GTX 555 offers 159.7% better value. The GRID M10-2B is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | GRID M10-2B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-94% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-63% | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.5+160% | 20.6 |
| Codename | GF116 | GM204 |
| Release | May 14 2011 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #849 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















