GeForce GTX 555 vs Quadro K3000M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 555 vs Quadro K3000M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 555 vs Quadro K3000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 555

2011

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K3000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro K3000M

2012

Why buy it

✅48.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K3000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 48.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (1,618 vs 1,604), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 555 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 555 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro K3000M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 555 vs Quadro K3000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 555

The GeForce GTX 555 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,604 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro K3000M

The Quadro K3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 654 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,618 points. Launch price was $155.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 555 scores 1,604 and the Quadro K3000M reaches 1,618 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 555 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Quadro K3000M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 144 (GeForce GTX 555) vs 576 (Quadro K3000M). Raw compute: 0.4147 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 555) vs 0.7534 TFLOPS (Quadro K3000M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 555	Quadro K3000M
G3D Mark Score	1,604	1,618
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	144	576+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4147 TFLOPS	0.7534 TFLOPS+82%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	48+100%
L1 Cache	192 KB+300%	48 KB
L2 Cache	384 KB	512 KB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 555 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K3000M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 555	Quadro K3000M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 555 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K3000M carries 2 GB. Quadro K3000M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 555 and 64-bit on the Quadro K3000M. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 555) vs 512 KB (Quadro K3000M) — the Quadro K3000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 555	Quadro K3000M
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	2 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	384 KB	512 KB+33%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 555 draws 70W versus the Quadro K3000M's 75W — a 6.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 555 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 555) vs 350W (Quadro K3000M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 555	Quadro K3000M
TDP	70W-7%	75W
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	210mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	22.9+6%	21.6

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro K3000M (2012 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 555	Quadro K3000M
MSRP	$150	—
Codename	GF116	GK104
Release	May 14 2011	June 1 2012
Ranking	#849	#748

Search GeForce GTX 555 on Amazon

Search Quadro K3000M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.