
GeForce GTX 555 vs Quadro P400

GeForce GTX 555
Popular choices:

Quadro P400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P400 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2011). The Quadro P400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 555 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 555.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 555 | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 555 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 555 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $60), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 93.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 555 | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+93.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 555 and Quadro P400

GeForce GTX 555
The GeForce GTX 555 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,604 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro P400
The Quadro P400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,659 points. Launch price was $119.99.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 555 scores 1,604 and the Quadro P400 reaches 1,659 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 555 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Quadro P400 uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 144 (GeForce GTX 555) vs 256 (Quadro P400). Raw compute: 0.4147 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 555) vs 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro P400).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,604 | 1,659+3% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 144 | 256+78% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4147 TFLOPS | 0.641 TFLOPS+55% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24+50% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+100% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 555 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P400 has 2 GB. The Quadro P400 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 555) vs 512 KB (Quadro P400) — the Quadro P400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 555) vs 12_1 (Quadro P400). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 555) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P400). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC 4th Gen.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 555 draws 70W versus the Quadro P400's 30W — a 80% difference. The Quadro P400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 555) vs 350W (Quadro P400). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 210mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 30W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 210mm | 145mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 22.9 | 55.3+141% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 555 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Quadro P400 launched at $169 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 555 costs 50% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.5 (GeForce GTX 555) vs 27.6 (Quadro P400) — the GeForce GTX 555 offers 93.8% better value. The Quadro P400 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-11% | $169 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-50% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.5+94% | 27.6 |
| Codename | GF116 | GP107 |
| Release | May 14 2011 | February 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #849 | #741 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















