Quadro K2000 vs Quadro K2000D

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K2000 vs Quadro K2000D FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K2000 vs Quadro K2000D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K2000

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro K2000D

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K2000D is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (1,600 vs 1,582), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K2000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K2000D makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $599 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1.1% (2.7 vs 2.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro K2000D is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K2000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K2000 vs Quadro K2000D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K2000

The Quadro K2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro K2000D

The Quadro K2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,600 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K2000 scores 1,582 and the Quadro K2000D reaches 1,600 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2000 is built on Kepler while the Quadro K2000D uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K2000) vs 384 (Quadro K2000D). Raw compute: 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000) vs 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000D).

Feature	Quadro K2000	Quadro K2000D
G3D Mark Score	1,582	1,600+1%
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7327 TFLOPS	0.7327 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	32
L1 Cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K2000	Quadro K2000D
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K2000 and 64-bit on the Quadro K2000D.

Feature	Quadro K2000	Quadro K2000D
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2000) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2000D). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro K2000	Quadro K2000D
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (Quadro K2000) vs NVENC 1st Gen (Quadro K2000D). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: H.264 (Quadro K2000) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro K2000D).

Feature	Quadro K2000	Quadro K2000D
Encoder	NVENC 1st gen	NVENC 1st Gen
Decoder	NVDEC 1st gen	NVDEC 1st Gen
Codecs	H.264	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K2000 draws 51W versus the Quadro K2000D's 51W — a 0% difference. The Quadro K2000D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2000) vs 350W (Quadro K2000D). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 202mm vs 202mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80.

Feature	Quadro K2000	Quadro K2000D
TDP	51W	51W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	202mm	202mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80
Perf/Watt	31.0	31.4+1%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K2000 came in at $599, while the Quadro K2000D launched at $599. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.6 (Quadro K2000) vs 2.7 (Quadro K2000D) — the Quadro K2000D offers 3.8% better value.

Feature	Quadro K2000	Quadro K2000D
MSRP	$599	$599
Performance per Dollar	2.6	2.7+4%
Codename	GK107	GK107
Release	March 1 2013	March 1 2013
Ranking	#756	#750

Search Quadro K2000 on Amazon

Search Quadro K2000D on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.