Quadro K2000
VS
Quadro K2000D

Quadro K2000 vs Quadro K2000D

NVIDIA

Quadro K2000

2013Core: 954 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K2000D

2013Core: 954 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K2000 is positioned at rank 261 and the Quadro K2000D is on rank 257, so the Quadro K2000D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2000

#107
Quadro P6000
MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500
98%
#108
Quadro M6000
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500
89%
#245
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
5596%
#260
GRID P4-8Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200
100%
#261
Quadro K2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
100%
#263
FirePro 3D V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $30
97%
#264
GRID M3-3020
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50
95%
#265
GRID P40-8Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
95%
#266
GRID M40
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
95%
#267
FirePro V3800
MSRP: $129|Avg: $12
94%
#268
FirePro V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $15
94%
#269
FirePro 3D V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $40
93%
#270
FirePro S9050
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825
93%
#271
FirePro R5000
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150
91%
#272
GRID M6-8Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
90%
#275
GRID K120Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $20
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2000D

#106
L40S
MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500
100%
#107
Quadro P6000
MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500
97%
#241
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
5533%
#257
Quadro K2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
100%
#258
FirePro V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $96
100%
#259
FirePro W8000
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
100%
#260
GRID P4-8Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200
99%
#261
Quadro K2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
99%
#263
FirePro 3D V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $30
96%
#264
GRID M3-3020
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50
94%
#265
GRID P40-8Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
94%
#266
GRID M40
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
94%
#267
FirePro V3800
MSRP: $129|Avg: $12
93%
#268
FirePro V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $15
93%
#269
FirePro 3D V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $40
92%
#270
FirePro S9050
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825
92%
#271
FirePro R5000
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro K2000D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro K2000.

InsightQuadro K2000Quadro K2000D
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)
Leading raw performance (+1.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro K2000D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro K2000D holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $500), it costs 93% less, resulting in a 1344.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro K2000Quadro K2000D
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1344.8%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)
More affordable ($35)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K2000 and Quadro K2000D

NVIDIA

Quadro K2000

The Quadro K2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

Quadro K2000D

The Quadro K2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,600 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K2000 scores 1,582 and the Quadro K2000D reaches 1,600 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2000 is built on Kepler while the Quadro K2000D uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K2000) vs 384 (Quadro K2000D). Raw compute: 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000) vs 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000D).

FeatureQuadro K2000Quadro K2000D
G3D Mark Score
1,582
1,600+1%
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7327 TFLOPS
0.7327 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
32 KB
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K2000Quadro K2000D
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureQuadro K2000Quadro K2000D
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2000) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2000D). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro K2000Quadro K2000D
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (Quadro K2000) vs NVENC 1st Gen (Quadro K2000D). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: H.264 (Quadro K2000) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro K2000D).

FeatureQuadro K2000Quadro K2000D
Encoder
NVENC 1st gen
NVENC 1st Gen
Decoder
NVDEC 1st gen
NVDEC 1st Gen
Codecs
H.264
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K2000 draws 51W versus the Quadro K2000D's 51W — a 0% difference. The Quadro K2000D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2000) vs 350W (Quadro K2000D). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 202mm vs 202mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80.

FeatureQuadro K2000Quadro K2000D
TDP
51W
51W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
202mm
202mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
70°C-13%
80
Perf/Watt
31.0
31.4+1%
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro K2000 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Quadro K2000D launched at $599 and now averages $35. The Quadro K2000D costs 93% less ($465 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.2 (Quadro K2000) vs 45.7 (Quadro K2000D) — the Quadro K2000D offers 1328.1% better value.

FeatureQuadro K2000Quadro K2000D
MSRP
$599
$599
Avg Price (30d)
$500
$35-93%
Performance per Dollar
3.2
45.7+1328%
Codename
GK107
GK107
Release
March 1 2013
March 1 2013
Ranking
#756
#750