Quadro K2000 vs Radeon Vega 9
Quadro K2000
Popular choices:
Radeon Vega 9
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro K2000 is positioned at rank #261 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Vega 9 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2013). The Radeon Vega 9 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K2000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Vega 9 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K2000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro K2000 | Radeon Vega 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Vega 9 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K2000 and Radeon Vega 9
Quadro K2000
The Quadro K2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points. Launch price was $599.
Radeon Vega 9
The Radeon Vega 9 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2021. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,588 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K2000 scores 1,582 and the Radeon Vega 9 reaches 1,588 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2000 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Vega 9 uses GCN 5.1, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K2000) vs 448 (Radeon Vega 9). Raw compute: 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000) vs 1.702 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 9).
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon Vega 9 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,582 | 1,588 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 448+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7327 TFLOPS | 1.702 TFLOPS+132% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+14% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon Vega 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K2000 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega 9 has 0 MB. The Quadro K2000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon Vega 9 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2000) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Vega 9). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon Vega 9 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (Quadro K2000) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Vega 9). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264 (Quadro K2000) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon Vega 9).
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon Vega 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K2000 draws 51W versus the Radeon Vega 9's 45W — a 12.5% difference. The Radeon Vega 9 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2000) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 9). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 202mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon Vega 9 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 51W | 45W-12% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 202mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 31.0 | 35.3+14% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K2000 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon Vega 9 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon Vega 9 costs 100+% less ($500 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.2 (Quadro K2000) vs Infinity (Radeon Vega 9) — the Radeon Vega 9 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Vega 9 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon Vega 9 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.2 | Infinity |
| Codename | GK107 | Cezanne |
| Release | March 1 2013 | April 13 2021 |
| Ranking | #756 | #601 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K2000 and Radeon Vega 9
