CPU
GPU
Quadro K2000
Popular choices:
Radeon 630
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K2000 is positioned at rank 261 and the Radeon 630 is on rank 292, so the Quadro K2000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 630
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 630 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2013). The Radeon 630 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K2000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 630.
| Insight | Quadro K2000 | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 630 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $500 for the Quadro K2000, it costs 90% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 895.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K2000 | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+895.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K2000 and Radeon 630
Quadro K2000
The Quadro K2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points. Launch price was $599.
Radeon 630
The Radeon 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K2000 scores 1,582 and the Radeon 630 reaches 1,575 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2000 is built on Kepler while the Radeon 630 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K2000) vs 512 (Radeon 630). Raw compute: 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 630).
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,582 | 1,575 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7327 TFLOPS | 1.247 TFLOPS+70% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 128 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K2000 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 630 has 512 MB. The Quadro K2000 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro K2000) vs 512 KB (Radeon 630) — the Radeon 630 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K2000 draws 51W versus the Radeon 630's 50W — a 2% difference. The Radeon 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2000) vs 350W (Radeon 630). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 51W | 50W-2% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 202mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 31.0 | 31.5+2% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K2000 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon 630 launched at $100 and now averages $50. The Radeon 630 costs 90% less ($450 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.2 (Quadro K2000) vs 31.5 (Radeon 630) — the Radeon 630 offers 884.4% better value. The Radeon 630 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $100-83% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $50-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.2 | 31.5+884% |
| Codename | GK107 | Polaris 23 |
| Release | March 1 2013 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #756 | #757 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K2000 and Radeon 630
