Quadro K2000 vs Radeon RX Vega11
Quadro K2000
Popular choices:
Radeon RX Vega11
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro K2000 is positioned at rank #261 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega11 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega11 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K2000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX Vega11 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K2000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro K2000 | Radeon RX Vega11 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX Vega11 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $500 for the Quadro K2000, it costs 92% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 1168.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K2000 | Radeon RX Vega11 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1168.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K2000 and Radeon RX Vega11
Quadro K2000
The Quadro K2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points. Launch price was $599.
Radeon RX Vega11
The Radeon RX Vega11 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1251 MHz. It has 704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,605 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K2000 scores 1,582 and the Radeon RX Vega11 reaches 1,605 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2000 is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX Vega11 uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K2000) vs 704 (Radeon RX Vega11). Raw compute: 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega11).
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon RX Vega11 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,582 | 1,605+1% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 704+83% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7327 TFLOPS | 1.761 TFLOPS+140% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32 | 44+38% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon RX Vega11 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K2000 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega11 has 0 MB. The Quadro K2000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon RX Vega11 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K2000 draws 51W versus the Radeon RX Vega11's 35W — a 37.2% difference. The Radeon RX Vega11 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2000) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega11). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon RX Vega11 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 51W | 35W-31% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 202mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 31.0 | 45.9+48% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K2000 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon RX Vega11 launched at $150 and now averages $40. The Radeon RX Vega11 costs 92% less ($460 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.2 (Quadro K2000) vs 40.1 (Radeon RX Vega11) — the Radeon RX Vega11 offers 1153.1% better value. The Radeon RX Vega11 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon RX Vega11 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $150-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $40-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.2 | 40.1+1153% |
| Codename | GK107 | Raven |
| Release | March 1 2013 | May 10 2018 |
| Ranking | #756 | #673 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K2000 and Radeon RX Vega11
